Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2025
Jump performance and hop function, kinesiophobia and return to sports are important prognostic factors for a subsequent injury after an anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: A 2-year follow-up cohort study.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Niederer Daniel, Keller Matthias, Petersen Wolf, Schüttler Karl-Friedrich, Efe Turgay, Engeroff Tobias, Groneberg David A, Heinrich Christine, Behringer Michael, Mengis Natalie, Ellermann Andree, Guenther Daniel, Brandl Georg, Drews Björn, Mehl Julian, Best Raymond, Pinggera Lucia, Schoepp Christian, Krause Matthias, Stein Thomas
Аннотация
PURPOSE: Finding prognostic factors for a subsequent injury after an anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction.
METHODS: We re-analysed the data of two intervention studies on adults with a hamstrings or quadriceps tendon ACL reconstruction. All participants were prospectively monitored for 24 months. At the end of the individual postsurgery rehabilitation, numerous self-reported and objective functional outcomes were quantified, all potential secondary injuries (primary outcome was the occurrence of secondary ipsi- or contralateral ACL injuries) and all rehabilitation and training measures were prospectively monitored. The association of potential factors with a secondary injury risk was determined using logistic mixed models.
RESULTS: We included 148 participants (mean age 25.3 years [standard deviation 5.1 years], 63 females). Eight participants had a subsequent ACL injury, among them seven ispilateral and one contralateral side ACL rupture. The final model for the likelihood of a subsequent ACL injury led to a sensitivity (correctly classified participants who had a subsequent ACL injury) of 83.3% and to a specificity (correctly identified participants without who did not have a subsequent ACL injury) of 100% (n = 93). The main contributing factors to subsequent ACL or any subsequent other injuries were: higher kinesiophobia values (odds ratio [OR] = 2.0, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.1-3.4), higher knee loading levels during activity (Tegner activity scale, OR = 29, 95% CI: 1.1-791), lower performance levels at the Balance front hop (OR = 0.13, 95% CI: 0.03-0.52), and higher dynamic valgus (knee separation distance in the frontal plane) during the landing of a drop jump landing (OR = 0.80, 95% CI: 0.65-0.98).
CONCLUSION: Most of the predictive factors for a second subsequent injury after an ACL reconstruction are modifiable by adequate training and rehabilitation measures. The modification of these factors might decrease the secondary risk of injury risk.
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II, a prospective cohort study.
METHODS: We re-analysed the data of two intervention studies on adults with a hamstrings or quadriceps tendon ACL reconstruction. All participants were prospectively monitored for 24 months. At the end of the individual postsurgery rehabilitation, numerous self-reported and objective functional outcomes were quantified, all potential secondary injuries (primary outcome was the occurrence of secondary ipsi- or contralateral ACL injuries) and all rehabilitation and training measures were prospectively monitored. The association of potential factors with a secondary injury risk was determined using logistic mixed models.
RESULTS: We included 148 participants (mean age 25.3 years [standard deviation 5.1 years], 63 females). Eight participants had a subsequent ACL injury, among them seven ispilateral and one contralateral side ACL rupture. The final model for the likelihood of a subsequent ACL injury led to a sensitivity (correctly classified participants who had a subsequent ACL injury) of 83.3% and to a specificity (correctly identified participants without who did not have a subsequent ACL injury) of 100% (n = 93). The main contributing factors to subsequent ACL or any subsequent other injuries were: higher kinesiophobia values (odds ratio [OR] = 2.0, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.1-3.4), higher knee loading levels during activity (Tegner activity scale, OR = 29, 95% CI: 1.1-791), lower performance levels at the Balance front hop (OR = 0.13, 95% CI: 0.03-0.52), and higher dynamic valgus (knee separation distance in the frontal plane) during the landing of a drop jump landing (OR = 0.80, 95% CI: 0.65-0.98).
CONCLUSION: Most of the predictive factors for a second subsequent injury after an ACL reconstruction are modifiable by adequate training and rehabilitation measures. The modification of these factors might decrease the secondary risk of injury risk.
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II, a prospective cohort study.