Complete mesocolic excision in colon cancer surgery: a comparison between open and laparoscopic approach.

BACKGROUND

Complete mesocolic excision (CME) with central vessel ligation (CVL) as performed in Erlangen offers the best long-term outcome for colon cancer. The aim of this study was to assess specimens after laparoscopic vs open CME-CVL macroscopically and morphometrically in patients with left and right colon cancers.

METHOD: All specimens were freshly photographed. Precise tumour morphometry and grading of the surgical plane were performed as described by pathologists in Leeds, UK.

RESULTS

Thirty-four specimens from right-sided cancers were divided into 18 transverse colon cancers (nine laparoscopic vs nine open) and 16 caecum-ascending colon cancers (seven laparoscopic vs nine open) and 56 specimens from left-sided cancers (33 laparoscopic vs 23 open). There was no difference between laparoscopically and open acquired left- and right-sided specimens. Specimens of transverse colon displayed differences in length of central ligation to tumour (open 11.67 cm vs laparoscopic 8.72 cm, P = 0.049), length of central ligation to bowel wall (open 9.11 cm vs laparoscopic 6.5 cm, P = 0.015) and lymph node clearance (open 46.33 vs laparoscopic 39.33, P = 0.033).

CONCLUSION

Laparoscopy seems to offer specimens of similar quality after CME-CVL surgery for colon cancer to the open approach. Issues of completeness of excision from laparoscopy are raised for tumours located in the transverse colon.