MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.cgh.2025.05.025

Медицинская библиотека · Clinical gastroenterology and hepatology : the official clinical practice journal of the American Gastroenterological Association · 2025

Lumen-Apposing Stents With or Without Pigtail in Endosonography-Guided Biliary Drainage for Malignant Distal Biliary Obstruction.

Sumalla-Garcia Albert, Aparicio-Tormo Jose R, Pedraza-Sanz Rafael, Sanchiz-Soler Vicente, De-la-Serna Higuera Carlos, Andujar Xavi, Vazquez-Sequeiros Enrique, Puigcerver-Mas Maria, Martinez-Moreno Belen, Barbera Tatiana, Capilla-Lozano Maria, Martinez-Ortega Antonio, Foruny-Olcina Jose Ramon, Luna-Rodriguez Daniel, Garcia-Lerma Esther, Peñafiel Judith, Busquets Barenys Juli, Laquente-Saez Berta, Perez-Miranda Manuel, Videla Sebastia, Loras Carme, Gornals Joan B, Spanish Working Group on Endoscopic Ultrasound Biliary Drainage

СтатьяРандомизированное исследованиеМногоцентровое исследованиеПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Endoscopic ultrasound-guided biliary drainage, creating a choledochoduodenostomy and using lumen-apposing metal stents (LAMSs), is a promising intervention for the management of malignant distal biliary obstruction (MDBO). But concerns exist regarding its stent patency. Our aim was to determine whether the insertion of an axis-orienting double-pigtail plastic stent (DPS) through LAMS offered a clinical benefit by improving the stent dysfunction rate.

METHODS

This multicenter randomized controlled trial was carried out in 7 tertiary hospitals. Patients with MDBO secondary to resectable, locally advanced, or unresectable cancers, and indication for biliary drainage, were eligible for inclusion. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to either the LAMS group or the LAMS-DPS group. The primary endpoint was the rate of recurrent biliary obstruction (RBO), detected during follow-up. The secondary endpoints were technical and clinical success, safety, time to RBO, reinterventions, and hospitalization.

RESULTS

Between November 2020 and October 2022, we screened 123 patients with MDBO, of whom 91 were randomly assigned to LAMS (n = 47) or LAMS-DPS (n = 44). RBO rate was lower in the LAMS-DPS group (14 [30%] of 47 patients vs 4 [9%] of 44 patients; relative risk, 0.31; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.09-0.78; P = .024). Hospitalization was shorter in the LAMS-DPS group (median difference, 4.5; 95% CI, 0-9; P = .016). The procedure time was longer (21 minutes vs 32 minutes; P = .018) in the LAMS-DPS group. No differences were found among technical, clinical success, and global adverse events (19 vs 27%; relative risk, 1.42; 95% CI, 0.67-3.18; P = .362).

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with MDBO, endoscopic ultrasound-guided biliary drainage using LAMS with coaxial DPS was superior to LAMS alone. It offered clinical benefits including lower recurrent biliary obstruction rate and shorter hospitalization.

CLINICALTRIALS: gov, Number: NCT04595058.

Для цитирования: Sumalla-Garcia Albert, Aparicio-Tormo Jose R, Pedraza-Sanz Rafael, Sanchiz-Soler Vicente, De-la-Serna Higuera Carlos, Andujar Xavi, Vazquez-Sequeiros Enrique, Puigcerver-Mas Maria, Martinez-Moreno Belen, Barbera Tatiana, Capilla-Lozano Maria, Martinez-Ortega Antonio, Foruny-Olcina Jose Ramon, Luna-Rodriguez Daniel, Garcia-Lerma Esther, Peñafiel Judith, Busquets Barenys Juli, Laquente-Saez Berta, Perez-Miranda Manuel, Videla Sebastia, Loras Carme, Gornals Joan B, Spanish Working Group on Endoscopic Ultrasound Biliary Drainage. Lumen-Apposing Stents With or Without Pigtail in Endosonography-Guided Biliary Drainage for Malignant Distal Biliary Obstruction.. Clinical gastroenterology and hepatology : the official clinical practice journal of the American Gastroenterological Association. 2025. DOI: 10.1016/j.cgh.2025.05.025.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.