MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1017/s0950268800057964

Медицинская библиотека · Epidemiology and infection · 1995

Cutaneous leishmaniasis in the Peruvian Andes: an epidemiological study of infection and immunity.

Davies C R, Llanos-Cuentas E A, Pyke S D, Dye C

СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

A prospective longitudinal survey of cutaneous leishmaniasis (Leishmania peruviana) was carried out in Peru on a study population of 4716 persons living in 38 villages (Departments of Lima, Ancash and Piura). Demographic and clinical data were collected from all individuals, and a Montenegro skin test (MST) was carried out on 72% (3418) of the study population. Each household was revisited at 3-monthly intervals for up to 2 years to detect new leishmaniasis cases; 497 people received a second MST at the end of the study. Analysis of the epidemiological data indicated that (i) 17% (16/94) of all infections were subclinical, (ii) this percentage increased significantly with age, (iii) clinical infections led to 73.9% protective immunity (95% C.I. 53.0-85.5%) and relatively permanent MST responsiveness (recovery rate = 0.0098/year; 95% C.I. 0.000-0.020/year), (iv) sub-clinical infections led to protective immunity, which was positively correlated with their MST induration size (increasing by 17.9% per mm; P < 0.0001), and a mean MST recovery rate of 0.114/year (4/421 man-months), and (v) recurrent leishmaniasis was dominated by reactivations, not by reinfections.

Для цитирования: Davies C R, Llanos-Cuentas E A, Pyke S D, Dye C. Cutaneous leishmaniasis in the Peruvian Andes: an epidemiological study of infection and immunity.. Epidemiology and infection. 1995. DOI: 10.1017/s0950268800057964.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.