Adjuvant, neoadjuvant, and surgical treatment for locally advanced cervical cancer: a Bayesian network meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE

Concurrent chemoradiotherapy remains the standard of care for locally advanced cervical cancer. Alternative strategies, such as induction chemotherapy followed by concurrent chemoradiotherapy and the addition of immune checkpoint inhibitors, show promise but lack consensus. Other approaches, including adjuvant chemotherapy and surgery, have also been explored. This network meta-analysis compared the efficacy of these approaches.

METHODS

A systematic review identified randomized controlled trials evaluating treatments for International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stage IB2 to IVA locally advanced cervical cancer. Interventions included concurrent chemoradiotherapy, induction chemotherapy, neoadjuvant or adjuvant chemotherapy, radiotherapy alone, concurrent chemoradiotherapy with immune checkpoint inhibitors, surgery, or their combinations. Progression-free and overall survival were assessed. HRs were extracted or reconstructed using individual patient data from Kaplan-Meier curves. A Bayesian network meta-analysis with random-effects models was conducted, with treatment rankings based on surface under the cumulative ranking curve and superiority probabilities.

RESULTS

Forty-seven trials (14,155 patients; 89% with squamous histology) were included. For overall survival (41 trials, 12,241 patients), no significant differences were observed among treatments, but concurrent chemoradiotherapy showed a trend toward superiority over radiotherapy alone (HR 0.84, 95% credible interval; 0.67-1.06; superiority probability = 93.1%). For progression-free survival (39 trials, 11,825 patients), concurrent chemoradiotherapy outperformed radiotherapy and induction chemotherapy followed by radiotherapy but showed similar efficacy to immune checkpoint inhibitor combinations, adjuvant chemotherapy, or induction chemotherapy. Concurrent chemoradiotherapy with immune checkpoint inhibitors ranked highest for both outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

Concurrent chemoradiotherapy remains more effective than radiotherapy alone or surgery and comparable to other combination strategies. These findings support it as the cornerstone of treatment for locally advanced cervical cancer while highlighting the promise of immune checkpoint inhibitor-based approaches.