MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.main.2012.04.001

Медицинская библиотека · Chirurgie de la main · 2012

Value of Gilliatt's pneumatic tourniquet test for diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome.

Thüngen T, Sadowski M, El Kazzi W, Schuind F

СтатьяРандомизированное исследованиеПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

OBJECTIVES

In 1953, Gilliatt and Wilson described the pneumatic-tourniquet test to diagnose the carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS). It was originally carried out by inflating a brachial cuff at suprasystolic pressure, looking for the appearance of dysesthesiae; several authors later proposed to perform it at infrasystolic pressure, arguing that it would better reflect the elevated venous pressure supposed to be present in CTS. The purpose of this study was to compare both methods.

METHODS

This prospective randomized controlled study included 49 patients and compared both methods to perform Gilliatt's test with more commonly used provocative tests (Tinel, Phalen, Durkan, and Weber). The following end-points were considered: typical clinical presentation, altered neurophysiological tests, abnormal ultrasound findings and early resolution of symptoms after surgical decompression.

RESULTS

For all these end-points, no significant difference was observed in sensibility nor specificity, whether Gilliatt's test was performed supra- or infra-systolic. In addition, Gilliatt's test proved to have less diagnostic value than Phalen and Durkan tests for sensibility.

CONCLUSION

This study did not permit to distinguish the two versions of Gilliatt's test but to open a discussion about the utility of such a test to diagnose the CTS.

Для цитирования: Thüngen T, Sadowski M, El Kazzi W, Schuind F. Value of Gilliatt's pneumatic tourniquet test for diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome.. Chirurgie de la main. 2012. DOI: 10.1016/j.main.2012.04.001.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.