DOI 10.3928/01913913-20220131-02
Medial Rectus Muscle Resection Versus Plication: A Comparison of Conjunctival-Scleral Thickness Measured by AS-OCT.
Аннотация
PURPOSE: To compare conjunctival-scleral thickness measured with anterior segment optical coherence tomography before and after medial rectus muscle resection and plication for exotropia.
METHODS
In this prospective observational study, patients with exotropia aged 5 years and older who underwent medial rectus muscle resection or plication through limbal incision of the conjunctiva between April 2016 and June 2018 were enrolled. Conjunctivalscleral thickness was measured with anterior segment optical coherence tomography before and 3 and 6 months after surgery at 1.5 mm (limbus), 4 mm (insertion), and 5.5 mm (tendon) posterior to the scleral spur. One examiner made measurements twice blinded for the initial data. Conjunctival-scleral thickness was compared between groups using the Mann-Whitney U test.
RESULTS
Twenty participants were divided into two groups: resection (n = 11) and plication (n = 9). The respective conjunctival-scleral thicknesses before and 3 and 6 months after surgery in the resection group were as follows: 0.76, 0.90, and 0.86 mm at the limbus; 0.86, 1.18, and 1.12 mm at the insertion; and 1.04, 1.41, and 1.33 mm at the tendon. Corresponding values in the plication group were as follows: 0.74, 0.87, and 0.81 mm at the limbus; 0.84, 1.16, and 1.08 mm at the insertion; and 1.00, 1.39, and 1.27 mm at the tendon. No between-group differences were observed at any location or time.
CONCLUSIONS
No differences in conjunctival-scleral thickness were observed between the resection and plication groups before surgery or at 3 months and 6 months postoperatively. [J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus. 2022;59(4):274-278.].
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.