DOI 10.1016/j.hrthm.2010.10.047
Concomitant chronic kidney disease increases the recurrence of atrial fibrillation after catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation: a mid-term follow-up.
Аннотация
BACKGROUND
Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is often associated with atrial fibrillation (AF). However, its impact on the results of radiofrequency catheter ablation for AF has not been fully examined.
OBJECTIVE
The purpose of this study was to clarify the relationship between CKD and postcatheter ablation AF recurrence.
METHODS
The study included 221 patients with AF who underwent successful catheter ablation. The prevalence and characteristics of AF recurrences were determined. CKD was defined as an estimated glomerular filtration rate <60 mL/min/1.73 m(2).
RESULTS
After mean follow-up of 31.9 ± 7.6 months, 87 (39%) patients had AF recurrences. Multivariate Cox regression analysis revealed that CKD (hazard ratio [HR] 2.089, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.292-3.378, P <.01) and left atrial volume (HR 1.009, 95% CI 1.002-1.017, P <.05) were independent predictors of AF recurrences. Among the 221 patients, 54 (24.4%) had CKD. Patients with CKD had a higher incidence of AF recurrences (57.4%) compared to the non-CKD patients (33.5%, P <.01). Compared with patients without CKD, patients with CKD were older (64 ± 11 years vs 58 ± 10 years, P <.001) and had a higher prevalence of hypertension (72% vs 53%, P <.05), larger left atrial volume (74.7 ± 29.4 mL vs 62.0 ± 26.0 mL, P <.01), and higher plasma B-type natriuretic peptide levels (129.6 ± 209.3 pg/mL vs 68.8 ± 91.0 pg/mL, P <.01).
CONCLUSION
The presence of CKD increased the risk of AF recurrences after catheter ablation. Multifactorial physiologic factors due to CKD may account for the higher prevalence of recurrent AF in patients with CKD than in those without.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.