MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1017/s0022215125000283

Медицинская библиотека · The Journal of laryngology and otology · 2025

Clinical efficacy of the dumbbell-shaped tragal cartilage-perichondrium air-filled chamber technique for small-to-medium tympanic membrane perforations: a retrospective study.

Ji Chao, Xu Fei-Fei

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of the dumbbell-shaped tragal cartilage-perichondrium air-filled chamber technique versus the gelatine sponge packing method for small-medium tympanic membrane perforations.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of 68 patients (39 air-filled chamber, 29 gelatine sponge) treated between January 2020 and September 2024. Pre- and post-operative assessments included pure tone audiometry, air-bone gap, tympanic membrane healing, and visual analogue scale scores.

RESULTS

Healing rates were similar (89.7 per cent vs 93.1 per cent, p = 0.959). At six months, pure tone audiometry and air-bone gap improvements were comparable (p > 0.05). At one month, the air-filled chamber group showed better hearing recovery (pure tone audiometry: 19.71 vs 24.27 dB HL; air-bone gap: 7.28 vs 12.28 dB HL; both p < 0.05) and lower pain scores (1.13 vs 1.59, p = 0.022). Complications and operative times were similar.

CONCLUSION

The air-filled chamber technique is a safe and effective alternative, offering superior early hearing recovery, reduced discomfort, and comparable long-term outcomes to the gelatine sponge method.

Для цитирования: Ji Chao, Xu Fei-Fei. Clinical efficacy of the dumbbell-shaped tragal cartilage-perichondrium air-filled chamber technique for small-to-medium tympanic membrane perforations: a retrospective study.. The Journal of laryngology and otology. 2025. DOI: 10.1017/s0022215125000283.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.