Journal of interventional cardiology · 2007
Plaque color analysis by the conventional yellow-color grading system and quantitative measurement using LCH color space.
Оценочное исследованиеСтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Okada Katsuki, Ueda Yasunori, Oyabu Jota, Ogasawara Nobuyuki, Hirayama Atsushi, Kodama Kazuhisa
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Yellow plaques of higher color grades are regarded as more vulnerable. We tried to elucidate the characteristics of yellow color that are regarded as the sign of vulnerable plaques by an objective and quantitative plaque color analysis.
METHODS: The color of yellow plaques was quantitatively analyzed using LCH color space and was presented by the maximum values of lightness (Lmax), chroma (Cmax), and hue (Hmax). Effect of light intensity on these parameters was experimentally examined (five plaque models, six light intensities). Relation between conventional yellow-color grade and LCH parameters was examined (31 plaques). Color analysis with LCH color space was applied (1) to compare the culprit lesions of unstable angina (eight patients) and of stable effort angina (nine patients) and (2) to evaluate the regression of yellow plaque by 80-week statin treatment (four patients, 19 plaques).
RESULTS: Cmax and Hmax were not influenced by light intensity so far as it was within appropriate range. Cmax (13 +/- 3, 25 +/- 5, and 28 +/- 4) became higher and Hmax (178 +/- 26, 134 +/- 10, and 91 +/- 16) became lower as the grade became higher (P < 0.0001). Culprit lesions of unstable angina had higher Cmax (22.8 +/- 7.9 vs 14.8 +/- 7.5, P = 0.04) and lower Hmax (73.3 +/- 19.7 vs 168.0 +/- 71.5, P = 0.002) than stable effort angina. Statin treatment reduced Cmax (21.3 +/- 9.6 vs 14.6 +/- 3.1, P = 0.004) and increased Hmax (82.6 +/- 25.8 vs 142.3 +/- 54.1, P = 0.0005).
CONCLUSIONS: Plaque color was consistently and quantitatively measurable using LCH color space uninfluenced by light intensity of appropriate range. Vulnerable yellow color had high chroma and low hue, indicating vivid and reddish-yellow color.
METHODS: The color of yellow plaques was quantitatively analyzed using LCH color space and was presented by the maximum values of lightness (Lmax), chroma (Cmax), and hue (Hmax). Effect of light intensity on these parameters was experimentally examined (five plaque models, six light intensities). Relation between conventional yellow-color grade and LCH parameters was examined (31 plaques). Color analysis with LCH color space was applied (1) to compare the culprit lesions of unstable angina (eight patients) and of stable effort angina (nine patients) and (2) to evaluate the regression of yellow plaque by 80-week statin treatment (four patients, 19 plaques).
RESULTS: Cmax and Hmax were not influenced by light intensity so far as it was within appropriate range. Cmax (13 +/- 3, 25 +/- 5, and 28 +/- 4) became higher and Hmax (178 +/- 26, 134 +/- 10, and 91 +/- 16) became lower as the grade became higher (P < 0.0001). Culprit lesions of unstable angina had higher Cmax (22.8 +/- 7.9 vs 14.8 +/- 7.5, P = 0.04) and lower Hmax (73.3 +/- 19.7 vs 168.0 +/- 71.5, P = 0.002) than stable effort angina. Statin treatment reduced Cmax (21.3 +/- 9.6 vs 14.6 +/- 3.1, P = 0.004) and increased Hmax (82.6 +/- 25.8 vs 142.3 +/- 54.1, P = 0.0005).
CONCLUSIONS: Plaque color was consistently and quantitatively measurable using LCH color space uninfluenced by light intensity of appropriate range. Vulnerable yellow color had high chroma and low hue, indicating vivid and reddish-yellow color.