Acta chirurgica Belgica · 2016
Complications of skull reconstruction after decompressive craniectomy.
СтатьяНаблюдательное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Herteleer Michiel, Ectors Nadine, Duflou Joost, Van Calenbergh Frank
Аннотация
INTRODUCTION: Decompressive craniectomy can be a life-saving procedure. Later reconstruction of the skull using the stored bone flap ("cranioplasty") is often associated with complications. These complications require new procedures and often result in the reconstruction of the skull using an expensive patient-specific cranial implant.
PATIENTS & METHODS: All adult patients who underwent cranioplasty after decompressive craniectomy in the last 10 years in our center were included (74 patients). Bone flap size, duration of the procedure, age, and other clinical parameters were included in our analysis.
RESULTS: 29.7% of our patients who received in the first place an autologous cranioplasty developed a complication which necessitated removal of the bone flap and the implantation of a custom-made implant. Descriptive statistics demonstrate a significantly higher amount of complications in younger patients (20-40 years, p = 0.027). We also saw a trend toward lower complications when bone flaps were stored according to a biobank protocol (p = 0.075).
CONCLUSIONS: Cranioplasty using the stored bone flap after decompressive craniectomy is associated with a high percentage of complications. Selecting patients at risk could possibly indicate cases where an immediate custom-made implant technique would be required.
PATIENTS & METHODS: All adult patients who underwent cranioplasty after decompressive craniectomy in the last 10 years in our center were included (74 patients). Bone flap size, duration of the procedure, age, and other clinical parameters were included in our analysis.
RESULTS: 29.7% of our patients who received in the first place an autologous cranioplasty developed a complication which necessitated removal of the bone flap and the implantation of a custom-made implant. Descriptive statistics demonstrate a significantly higher amount of complications in younger patients (20-40 years, p = 0.027). We also saw a trend toward lower complications when bone flaps were stored according to a biobank protocol (p = 0.075).
CONCLUSIONS: Cranioplasty using the stored bone flap after decompressive craniectomy is associated with a high percentage of complications. Selecting patients at risk could possibly indicate cases where an immediate custom-made implant technique would be required.