The Laryngoscope · 2015
Facial nerve stimulation in the narrow bony cochlear nerve canal after cochlear implantation.
Оценочное исследованиеСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Rah Yoon Chan, Yoon Young-Sun, Chang Moon Young, Lee Ji Young, Suh Myung-Whan, Lee Jun Ho, Oh Seung-Ha, Chang Sun O, Park Moo Kyun
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: To evaluate the correlation between a narrow bony cochlear nerve canal (BCNC) and facial nerve stimulation (FNS) after cochlear implantation (CI) and their underlying mechanisms and to predict the risk of FNS preoperatively.
STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study.
METHODS: A total of 64 pediatric cases that underwent CI were included. Among them, 32 cases experienced FNS after CI, and another 32 cases were selected from 817 pediatric implantees by stratified random sampling. The width of the BCNC, the status of the cochlear nerve (CN) and the internal auditory canal (IAC), T level, and C level were compared and analyzed. Strategies for eliminating FNS were also analyzed.
RESULTS: The FNS group showed a narrower BCNC (1.09 ± 0.52 mm) than the control group (1.99 ± 0.61 mm; P < .01), a lower CN/facial nerve ratio (0.32 ± 0.36) than the control group (1.34 ± 0.76; P < .01), and narrower IAC diameter (4.06 ± 1.71 mm) than the control group (5.66 ± 1.36 mm; P < .01). The FNS group also showed higher T level (165.7 ± 28.3 μA) than the control group (142.2 ± 21.2 μA; P < .01). Adjustment of the C levels and/or pulse width and switching off offending electrodes were attempted to eliminate FNS, with a 75.0% success rate. The FNS group still showed low Categories of Auditory Performance scores (3.00 ± 1.90) compared with the control group (5.94 ± 1.41, P < .01) after adjustment.
CONCLUSIONS: A narrow BCNC could be a cause of FNS after CI. Therefore, careful selection of the side for CI and programming strategies are required to reduce FNS.
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4. Laryngoscope, 126:1433-1439, 2016.
STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study.
METHODS: A total of 64 pediatric cases that underwent CI were included. Among them, 32 cases experienced FNS after CI, and another 32 cases were selected from 817 pediatric implantees by stratified random sampling. The width of the BCNC, the status of the cochlear nerve (CN) and the internal auditory canal (IAC), T level, and C level were compared and analyzed. Strategies for eliminating FNS were also analyzed.
RESULTS: The FNS group showed a narrower BCNC (1.09 ± 0.52 mm) than the control group (1.99 ± 0.61 mm; P < .01), a lower CN/facial nerve ratio (0.32 ± 0.36) than the control group (1.34 ± 0.76; P < .01), and narrower IAC diameter (4.06 ± 1.71 mm) than the control group (5.66 ± 1.36 mm; P < .01). The FNS group also showed higher T level (165.7 ± 28.3 μA) than the control group (142.2 ± 21.2 μA; P < .01). Adjustment of the C levels and/or pulse width and switching off offending electrodes were attempted to eliminate FNS, with a 75.0% success rate. The FNS group still showed low Categories of Auditory Performance scores (3.00 ± 1.90) compared with the control group (5.94 ± 1.41, P < .01) after adjustment.
CONCLUSIONS: A narrow BCNC could be a cause of FNS after CI. Therefore, careful selection of the side for CI and programming strategies are required to reduce FNS.
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4. Laryngoscope, 126:1433-1439, 2016.