MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.2165/00128072-200103080-00001

Медицинская библиотека · Paediatric drugs · 2001

Efficacy and tolerability of cisapride in children.

Vandenplas Y, Benatar A, Cools F, Arana A, Hegar B, Hauser B

СтатьяОбзорПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

As gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GORD) in infants and children is a motility disorder which differs in pathophysiology and clinical course from GORD in adults, prokinetics should be considered the drug of choice in certain circumstances. Indeed, cisapride may result in improvement of feeding tolerance in premature infants. Cisapride has a better tolerability profile than a 'wait-and-see-if-improvement-comes-spontaneously' policy or the other therapeutic options available. A careful and critical review of published data suggests that cisapride may have a QTc-prolonging effect. However, provided the precautions for cisapride administration are followed, the QTc-prolonging effect remains consistently without clinically relevant adverse effects. Correct dosage and avoidance of concurrent treatment with macrolides and/or azoles are the most relevant tolerability recommendations in children. Although there is a need for a prokinetic with better efficacy, cisapride is currently the prokinetic with the best benefit-to-risk ratio available. Thus, withdrawal of cisapride would result in a significantly increased risk for severe complications in infants and children with GORD or other gastrointestinal motility disorders such as chronic intestinal pseudo-obstruction, gastroparesis and feed intolerance in premature infants.

Для цитирования: Vandenplas Y, Benatar A, Cools F, Arana A, Hegar B, Hauser B. Efficacy and tolerability of cisapride in children.. Paediatric drugs. 2001. DOI: 10.2165/00128072-200103080-00001.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.