MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1007/s00784-020-03710-w

Медицинская библиотека · Clinical oral investigations · 2021

Prevalence of temporomandibular joint disorders: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Valesan Lígia Figueiredo, Da-Cas Cecília Doebber, Réus Jéssica Conti, Denardin Ana Cristina Scremin, Garanhani Roberto Ramos, Bonotto Daniel, Januzzi Eduardo, de Souza Beatriz Dulcineia Mendes

СтатьяМетаанализСистематический обзорПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this systematic review was to evaluate the prevalence of temporomandibular joint disorders (TMJD) among the general population.

MATERIALS AND

METHODS

Five main electronic databases and three grey literature were searched to identify observational studies in which TMJD was diagnosed using the research diagnostic criteria (RDC/TMD) or diagnostic criteria (DC/TMD). The studies were blindly selected by two reviewers based on eligibility criteria. Risk of bias (RoB) was assessed using the Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal Checklist, and the "R" Statistics software was used to perform meta-analyses.

RESULTS

From 2741 articles, 21 were included. Ten studies were judged at low RoB, seven at moderate, and four at high. The TMJD investigated were as follows: arthralgia, disk displacement (DDs) with reduction (DDwR), DDwR with intermittent locking, DDs without reduction (DDwoR) with limited opening, DDwoR without limited opening, degenerative joint disease (DJD), osteoarthritis, osteoarthrosis, and subluxation. The main results from prevalence overall meta-analyses for adults/elderly are as follows: TMJD (31.1%), DDs (19.1%), and DJD (9.8%). Furthermore, for children/adolescents are as follows: TMJD (11.3%), DDs (8.3%), and DJD (0.4%). Considering the individual diagnosis meta-analyses, the most prevalent TMJD is DDwR for adults/elderly (25.9%) and children/adolescents (7.4%).

CONCLUSIONS

The overall prevalence of TMJD was approximately 31% for adults/elderly and 11% for children/adolescents, and the most prevalent TMJD was DDwR.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Knowledge about the frequency of TMJD can encourage dentists to consider appropriate strategies for early and correct diagnosis and, if need be, correct management.

Для цитирования: Valesan Lígia Figueiredo, Da-Cas Cecília Doebber, Réus Jéssica Conti, Denardin Ana Cristina Scremin, Garanhani Roberto Ramos, Bonotto Daniel, Januzzi Eduardo, de Souza Beatriz Dulcineia Mendes. Prevalence of temporomandibular joint disorders: a systematic review and meta-analysis.. Clinical oral investigations. 2021. DOI: 10.1007/s00784-020-03710-w.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.