MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1111/joor.13104

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of oral rehabilitation · 2020

Diagnostic accuracy of the Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders for children aged 8-12 years.

Katsikogianni Eleni, Schweigert-Gabler Susette, Krisam Johannes, Orhan Gül, Bissar Abdul, Lux Christopher J, Schmitter Marc, Giannakopoulos Nikolaos Nikitas

СтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

BACKGROUND AND

OBJECTIVE

Objective of this study was to determine whether the diagnostic accuracy of the Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders (DC/TMD) is sufficient for use among schoolchildren aged 8-12 years.

METHODS

This prospective cohort study on diagnostic accuracy with calibrated examiners was conducted among 533 children of both sexes aged 8-12 years, with and without TMD symptoms, selected randomly from the Rhein-Neckar district. Self-reporting of non-dental facial pain was used as the reference standard, against which we calculated the following for the pain-related items of the DC/TMD (index test): sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative likelihood ratios, diagnostic odds ratio, accuracy and 95% Wilson Score confidence intervals. We also calculated the area under the receiver-operating characteristic (AUROC) curve displaying sensitivity and specificity.

RESULTS

Our final sample consisted of 282 children, half of whom reported having facial pain and 3.2% reported sounds from the temporomandibular joints (TMJs). Despite high specificity (90.78%; 95% confidence interval (CI): [84.86%; 94.53%]), sensitivity of the adapted DC/TMD for pain on maximum jaw opening was poor (37.59%; 95% CI: [30.02%; 45.81%]). For pain on palpation, more similar values were recorded for sensitivity (74.47%; 95% CI: [66.69%; 80.95%]) and specificity (70.21%; 95% CI: [62.21%; 77.14%]). The diagnostic odds ratio was >1 for both examinations. The AUROC for pain on opening was 68.39% (95% CI: [62.62%; 74.16%]), and for pain on palpation, it was 74.63% (95% CI: [69.45%; 79.81%]), whereas the combination of both resulted to an AUROC of 74.09% (95% CI: [68.96%; 79.21%]). It was not possible to measure the diagnostic accuracy of the DC/TMD regarding TMJ sounds or jaw-opening limitations, as they occurred too rarely in our sample.

CONCLUSION

In this study, the diagnostic accuracy of the DC/TMD for TMD-related pain in children was lower than that recorded for adults in previous studies.

Для цитирования: Katsikogianni Eleni, Schweigert-Gabler Susette, Krisam Johannes, Orhan Gül, Bissar Abdul, Lux Christopher J, Schmitter Marc, Giannakopoulos Nikolaos Nikitas. Diagnostic accuracy of the Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders for children aged 8-12 years.. Journal of oral rehabilitation. 2020. DOI: 10.1111/joor.13104.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.