MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций
Медицинская библиотека · Sleep · 2003

Attention deficits in patients with narcolepsy.

Rieger Martina, Mayer Geert, Gauggel Siegfried

СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

STUDY

OBJECTIVES

Although attention problems are presumably responsible for a wide variety of difficulties patients with narcolepsy experience in everyday life, empirical investigation of this issue is scarce. Therefore, we conducted a systematic investigation of different aspects of attention and verbal memory in patients with narcolepsy.

DESIGN

Control-group design with comparison of performance in four attention tests--measuring phasic alertness, focused attention, divided attention, and flexible attention--and one verbal memory test.

PARTICIPANTS

19 patients with narcolepsy (NG) and 20 healthy controls (CG) MEASUREMENTS AND

RESULTS

The NG showed no deficits in phasic alertness, focused attention, and verbal memory. However, specific deficits occurred in divided and flexible attention. Furthermore, the NG had generally slower and more variable reaction times in all attention tasks.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results contradict the hypothesis that attentional impairments in narcolepsy are merely a result of a temporal disturbance of information processing, i.e., deficits can be explained by slowness and variability of performance alone. Rather, deficits in attentional capacity and attentional control also seem to play an important role. Thus, in addition to impairment in the vigilance attention network, results indicate impairment in the executive attention network in patients with narcolepsy.

Для цитирования: Rieger Martina, Mayer Geert, Gauggel Siegfried. Attention deficits in patients with narcolepsy.. Sleep. 2003.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.