MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.3233/rnn-211198

Медицинская библиотека · Restorative neurology and neuroscience · 2021

Non-invasive electrical brain stimulation for vision restoration after stroke: An exploratory randomized trial (REVIS).

Räty Silja, Borrmann Carolin, Granata Giuseppe, Cárdenas-Morales Lizbeth, Schoenfeld Ariel, Sailer Michael, Silvennoinen Katri, Holopainen Juha, De Rossi Francesca, Antal Andrea, Rossini Paolo M, Tatlisumak Turgut, Sabel Bernhard A

СтатьяРандомизированное исследованиеПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Occipital strokes often cause permanent homonymous hemianopia leading to significant disability. In previous studies, non-invasive electrical brain stimulation (NIBS) has improved vision after optic nerve damage and in combination with training after stroke.

OBJECTIVE

We explored different NIBS modalities for rehabilitation of hemianopia after chronic stroke.

METHODS

In a randomized, double-blinded, sham-controlled, three-armed trial, altogether 56 patients with homonymous hemianopia were recruited. The three experiments were: i) repetitive transorbital alternating current stimulation (rtACS, n = 8) vs. rtACS with prior cathodal transcranial direct current stimulation over the intact visual cortex (tDCS/rtACS, n = 8) vs. sham (n = 8); ii) rtACS (n = 9) vs. sham (n = 9); and iii) tDCS of the visual cortex (n = 7) vs. sham (n = 7). Visual functions were evaluated before and after the intervention, and after eight weeks follow-up. The primary outcome was change in visual field assessed by high-resolution and standard perimetries. The individual modalities were compared within each experimental arm.

RESULTS

Primary outcomes in Experiments 1 and 2 were negative. Only significant between-group change was observed in Experiment 3, where tDCS increased visual field of the contralesional eye compared to sham. tDCS/rtACS improved dynamic vision, reading, and visual field of the contralesional eye, but was not superior to other groups. rtACS alone increased foveal sensitivity, but was otherwise ineffective. All trial-related procedures were tolerated well.

CONCLUSIONS

This exploratory trial showed safety but no main effect of NIBS on vision restoration after stroke. However, tDCS and combined tDCS/rtACS induced improvements in visually guided performance that need to be confirmed in larger-sample trials.NCT01418820 (clinicaltrials.gov).

Для цитирования: Räty Silja, Borrmann Carolin, Granata Giuseppe, Cárdenas-Morales Lizbeth, Schoenfeld Ariel, Sailer Michael, Silvennoinen Katri, Holopainen Juha, De Rossi Francesca, Antal Andrea, Rossini Paolo M, Tatlisumak Turgut, Sabel Bernhard A. Non-invasive electrical brain stimulation for vision restoration after stroke: An exploratory randomized trial (REVIS).. Restorative neurology and neuroscience. 2021. DOI: 10.3233/rnn-211198.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.