Anticancer research · 2021
Diagnostic Role of PET/CT Tracers in the Detection and Localization of Tumours Responsible for Ectopic Cushing's Syndrome.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Zisser Lucia, Kulterer Oana C, Itariu Bianca, Fueger Barbara, Weber Michael, Mazal Peter, Vraka Chrysoula, Pichler Verena, Kautzky-Willer Alexandra, Hacker Marcus, Karanikas Georgios, Rasul Sazan
Аннотация
BACKGROUND/AIM: Positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) plays an important role in cancer localization in ectopic Cushing's syndrome (ECS). However, the choice of the optimal tracer for investigation of this disease is still unclear. We aimed to evaluate the diagnostic feasibility of [18F]fluoro-2-deoxyglucose ([18F]FDG), [18F]fluoro-L-dihydroxyphenylalanine ([18F] FDOPA), and [68Ga]-DOTA-1-Nal3-octreotide ([68Ga]-DOTANOC) in ECS.
PATIENTS AND METHODS: All PET/CT scans of patients admitted to our department for suspected ECS between 2010 and 2020 were retrospectively analysed.
RESULTS: Collectively, 30 PET/CT examinations, 11 with [18F]FDOPA, 11 with [18F]FDG and 8 with [68Ga]GaDOTANOC were conducted for 18 patients eligible for analysis. [18F]FDG detected the tumour in 3/6 of the cases, [18F]FDOPA in 3/4, and [68Ga]GaDOTANOC in 3/3. [18F]FDOPA was the only tracer without false positive results.
CONCLUSION: [68Ga]GaDOTANOC and [18F]FDOPA showed superior results compared to [18F]FDG, although the sensitivity of the tracers might be influenced by the aetiology of the tumour underlying the ECS.
PATIENTS AND METHODS: All PET/CT scans of patients admitted to our department for suspected ECS between 2010 and 2020 were retrospectively analysed.
RESULTS: Collectively, 30 PET/CT examinations, 11 with [18F]FDOPA, 11 with [18F]FDG and 8 with [68Ga]GaDOTANOC were conducted for 18 patients eligible for analysis. [18F]FDG detected the tumour in 3/6 of the cases, [18F]FDOPA in 3/4, and [68Ga]GaDOTANOC in 3/3. [18F]FDOPA was the only tracer without false positive results.
CONCLUSION: [68Ga]GaDOTANOC and [18F]FDOPA showed superior results compared to [18F]FDG, although the sensitivity of the tracers might be influenced by the aetiology of the tumour underlying the ECS.