MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.4065/74.1.5

Медицинская библиотека · Mayo Clinic proceedings · 1999

The Mayo Clinic gamma knife experience: indications and initial results.

Pollock B E, Gorman D A, Schomberg P J, Kline R W

СтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE

To review the results and expectations of contemporary stereotactic radiosurgery.

MATERIAL AND

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective analysis of 1,033 consecutive patients who underwent gamma knife radiosurgery at Mayo Clinic Rochester between January 1990 and January 1998.

RESULTS

The number of patients undergoing radiosurgery increased from 57 in 1990 to 216 in 1997. Of 97 patients with arteriovenous malformations who underwent follow-up angiography 2 years or more after a single radiosurgical procedure, 72 (74%) had complete obliteration of the vascular malformation. Of 209 patients who underwent radiosurgery for benign tumors (schwannomas, meningiomas, or pituitary adenomas) and had radiologic studies after 2 years or more of follow-up, tumor growth control was noted in 200 (96%). Tumor growth was also controlled in 90% of brain metastatic lesions at a median of 7 months after radiosurgery. Of 20 patients with trigeminal neuralgia and follow-up for more than 2 months, 14 (70%) were free of pain after radiosurgery.

CONCLUSION

Radiosurgery is a safe and effective management strategy for a wide variety of intracranial disorders. Use of radiosurgical treatment should continue to increase as more data become available on the long-term results of this procedure.

Для цитирования: Pollock B E, Gorman D A, Schomberg P J, Kline R W. The Mayo Clinic gamma knife experience: indications and initial results.. Mayo Clinic proceedings. 1999. DOI: 10.4065/74.1.5.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.