Radiology · 1997
Trigeminal neuralgia: comparison of two MR imaging techniques in the demonstration of neurovascular contact.
Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Majoie C B, Hulsmans F J, Verbeeten B, Castelijns J A, van Beek E J, Valk J, Bosch D A
Аннотация
PURPOSE: To compare two magnetic resonance (MR) imaging techniques for demonstration of vascular contact with the trigeminal nerve.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirteen patients with unilateral trigeminal neuralgia and 50 control subjects underwent three-dimensional fast inflow with steady-state precession (FISP) and contrast material-enhanced magnetization-prepared rapid acquisition gradient-echo (MP-RAGE) MR imaging. The images were independently reviewed by two neuroradiologists, who were blinded to the clinical details. Six of the 13 patients underwent surgery.
RESULTS: Vascular contact with the trigeminal nerve at the root entry zone was seen on FISP images in 10 of 13 (77%) symptomatic nerves and in eight of 113 (7%) asymptomatic nerves (P < .001). MP-RAGE and FISP images demonstrated arterial contacts equally well. MP-RAGE images demonstrated one additional venous contact at the root entry zone in a patient with ipsilateral trigeminal neuralgia. Interobserver agreement was good for both FISP (kappa = 0.69) and MP-RAGE (kappa = 0.78) images. The presence of vascular contact at the root entry zone, seen on preoperative MR images, was confirmed in all six patients who underwent surgery.
CONCLUSION: Both FISP and MP-RAGE MR imaging are useful in demonstrating vascular contact with the trigeminal nerve at the root entry zone in patients with trigeminal neuralgia.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirteen patients with unilateral trigeminal neuralgia and 50 control subjects underwent three-dimensional fast inflow with steady-state precession (FISP) and contrast material-enhanced magnetization-prepared rapid acquisition gradient-echo (MP-RAGE) MR imaging. The images were independently reviewed by two neuroradiologists, who were blinded to the clinical details. Six of the 13 patients underwent surgery.
RESULTS: Vascular contact with the trigeminal nerve at the root entry zone was seen on FISP images in 10 of 13 (77%) symptomatic nerves and in eight of 113 (7%) asymptomatic nerves (P < .001). MP-RAGE and FISP images demonstrated arterial contacts equally well. MP-RAGE images demonstrated one additional venous contact at the root entry zone in a patient with ipsilateral trigeminal neuralgia. Interobserver agreement was good for both FISP (kappa = 0.69) and MP-RAGE (kappa = 0.78) images. The presence of vascular contact at the root entry zone, seen on preoperative MR images, was confirmed in all six patients who underwent surgery.
CONCLUSION: Both FISP and MP-RAGE MR imaging are useful in demonstrating vascular contact with the trigeminal nerve at the root entry zone in patients with trigeminal neuralgia.