Practical radiation oncology · 2024
Radiosurgery Society Case-Based Guide to Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy for Challenging Cases of Spinal Metastases.
СтатьяКлинический случайНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Aziz Khaled, Koffler Daniel, Vassantachart April, Rattani Abbas, Ankrah Nii-Kwanchie, Gogineni Emile, Andraos Therese Y, Sahgal Arjun, Vellayappan Balamurugan, Dunne Emma M, Siva Shankar, Moraes Fabio Y, Guckenberger Matthias, Lubelski Daniel, Chao Samuel, Combs Stephanie, Chang Eric, Amin Anubhav G, Foote Matthew, Gibbs Iris, Kim Minsun, Palmer Joshua, Lo Simon, Redmond Kristin J
Аннотация
PURPOSE: Spinal stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) has become the standard of care in management of patients with limited sites of metastatic disease, radioresistant histologies, painful vertebral metastases with long life expectancy and cases of reirradiation. Our case-based guidelines aim to assist radiation oncologists in the appropriate utilization of SBRT for common, yet challenging, cases of spinal metastases.
METHODS AND MATERIALS: Cases were selected to include scenarios of large volume sacral disease with nerve entrapment, medically inoperable disease abutting the thecal sac, and local failure after prior SBRT. Relevant literature was reviewed, and areas requiring further investigation were discussed to offer a framework for evidence-based clinical practice.
RESULTS: Spinal SBRT can be effectively delivered in challenging cases following multidisciplinary discussion by using a methodical approach to patient selection, appropriate dose selection, and adherence to evidence-based dose constraints.
CONCLUSIONS: The Radiosurgery Society's case-based practice review offers guidance to practicing physicians treating technically challenging SBRT candidate patients with spinal metastases.
METHODS AND MATERIALS: Cases were selected to include scenarios of large volume sacral disease with nerve entrapment, medically inoperable disease abutting the thecal sac, and local failure after prior SBRT. Relevant literature was reviewed, and areas requiring further investigation were discussed to offer a framework for evidence-based clinical practice.
RESULTS: Spinal SBRT can be effectively delivered in challenging cases following multidisciplinary discussion by using a methodical approach to patient selection, appropriate dose selection, and adherence to evidence-based dose constraints.
CONCLUSIONS: The Radiosurgery Society's case-based practice review offers guidance to practicing physicians treating technically challenging SBRT candidate patients with spinal metastases.