DOI 10.1016/j.apmr.2006.07.260
Prevalence and natural history of colonization with fluoroquinolone-resistant gram-negative bacilli in community-dwelling people with spinal cord dysfunction.
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES
To estimate the prevalence of colonization with fluoroquinolone-resistant gram-negative bacilli (GNB) and to assess risk factors for and define the natural history of colonization.
DESIGN
Cross-sectional study with follow-up of up to 1 year.
SETTING
Multiple outpatient sites.
PARTICIPANTS
Eighty-four community-dwelling adults with spinal cord dysfunction.
INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Colonization of perineum with fluoroquinolone-resistant GNB.
RESULTS
Overall, 24% of this community-dwelling cohort was colonized with fluoroquinolone-resistant GNB with resistance to both levofloxacin and gatifloxacin. The use of any antibiotic in the last 90 days was most strongly associated with an increased risk of colonization with fluoroquinolone-resistant GNB (relative risk, 2.3; 95% confidence interval, 1.1-4.8; P=.05). Incontinence was significantly more common among those with fluoroquinolone-resistant GNB colonization. Among the participants with incontinence (n=42), the use of intermittent catheterization (vs suprapubic, urethral, or condom catheters or overflow incontinence) was significantly protective. Colonization was not associated with an increase in urinary tract infection and was often transient.
CONCLUSIONS
Fluoroquinolone resistance among GNB colonizing community-dwelling people with spinal cord dysfunction is common. Colonization is more common among those receiving antibiotics and less common among those continent of urine. Among those with incontinence, those using intermittent catheterization have less colonization.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.