Scandinavian journal of gastroenterology · 1994
The effect of cisapride and metoclopramide on human digestive and interdigestive antroduodenal motility.
Клиническое исследованиеСравнительное исследованиеСтатьяРандомизированное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Lux G, Katschinski M, Ludwig S, Lederer P, Ellermann A, Domschke W
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: To date, there is little information available about the effect of cisapride and metoclopramide on gastroduodenal pressure waves and their space/time orientation.
METHODS: Antroduodenal pressures (two antral, three duodenal recording sites) were measured in nine healthy volunteers. Cisapride (10 mg), metoclopramide (10 mg), and placebo were administered intravenously on different days in a randomized manner.
RESULTS: During the interdigestive state cisapride increased the motility index significantly in the antrum (p < 0.05) and duodenum (p < 0.005), metoclopramide only in the duodenum (p < 0.01). Antroduodenal coordination was significantly (p < 0.01) improved by cisapride but not by metoclopramide. There is evidence of antroduodenal coordination even during the interdigestive state. After a liquid test meal an increase in the antroduodenal motility index (p < 0.05), in the rate of prograde antroduodenal peristalsis (p < 0.01), and in antroduodenal coordination (p < 0.01) was caused by cisapride but not metoclopramide. Both prokinetics decreased (p < 0.01) retrograde antroduodenal peristalsis.
CONCLUSION: Cisapride significantly improves antroduodenal coordination and antroduodenal motility; metoclopramide seems to be less effective.
METHODS: Antroduodenal pressures (two antral, three duodenal recording sites) were measured in nine healthy volunteers. Cisapride (10 mg), metoclopramide (10 mg), and placebo were administered intravenously on different days in a randomized manner.
RESULTS: During the interdigestive state cisapride increased the motility index significantly in the antrum (p < 0.05) and duodenum (p < 0.005), metoclopramide only in the duodenum (p < 0.01). Antroduodenal coordination was significantly (p < 0.01) improved by cisapride but not by metoclopramide. There is evidence of antroduodenal coordination even during the interdigestive state. After a liquid test meal an increase in the antroduodenal motility index (p < 0.05), in the rate of prograde antroduodenal peristalsis (p < 0.01), and in antroduodenal coordination (p < 0.01) was caused by cisapride but not metoclopramide. Both prokinetics decreased (p < 0.01) retrograde antroduodenal peristalsis.
CONCLUSION: Cisapride significantly improves antroduodenal coordination and antroduodenal motility; metoclopramide seems to be less effective.