MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1111/myc.12314

Медицинская библиотека · Mycoses · 2015

Epidemiology of chronic fungal rhinosinusitis in rural India.

Chakrabarti Arunaloke, Rudramurthy Shivaprakash M, Panda Naresh, Das Ashim, Singh Amarjeet

СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

A descriptive epidemiological study of fungal rhinosinusitis (FRS) was conducted in rural north India in the form of house-to-house survey of villages of two districts each of Punjab and Haryana provinces using a clinical case definition of chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS). The suspected cases were investigated further in the laboratory to confirm FRS. Air and environment were sampled in different seasons to find Aspergillus spore count. The prevalence of chronic FRS cases was at 0.11% of the population and Aspergillus flavus was the predominant (97.6%) agent of all types of chronic FRS. The chronic FRS patients were classified as allergic FRS 41 (56.1%), chronic granulomatous FRS 13 (17.8%), eosinophilic FRS 11 (15.0%), fungal ball 7 (9.5%) and chronic invasive FRS 1 (1.3%). Aspergillus spores were present in large numbers (~20%) in air with significantly higher counts of A. flavus during winter months in the wheat-thrashing areas of Punjab as compared to Haryana (P = 0.0079). The present study identified high prevalence (27.5% of CRS cases) of chronic FRS cases in rural north India and its possible association with wheat harvesting seasons.

Для цитирования: Chakrabarti Arunaloke, Rudramurthy Shivaprakash M, Panda Naresh, Das Ashim, Singh Amarjeet. Epidemiology of chronic fungal rhinosinusitis in rural India.. Mycoses. 2015. DOI: 10.1111/myc.12314.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.