Revista iberoamericana de micologia · 2014
[Repeating the Platelia™ Aspergillus test in samples positive for serum galactomannan: Is it necessary?].
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Roiz María Pía, García María del Sol, Martínez-Martínez Luis
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: The manufacturers of the Platelia™ Aspergillus test recommend retesting every sample with a positive result to galactomannan detection.
AIMS: To evaluate the repeated results of the Platelia™ Aspergillus test on initially positive samples, and their association with clinical and microbiological studies.
METHODS: A total of 150 positive sera belonging to 92 patients were studied. More than one positive sample was obtained from 31 (33.6%) patients. Nine patients were diagnosed with probable invasive aspergillosis and two with proven Fusarium oxysporum and Scedosporium prolificans invasive fungal infection, respectively.
RESULTS: Only 35 out of 150 (23.3%) sera remained positive upon test repetition. The average OD-index difference between the initially positive and subsequently negative samples was 0.76. Sera from 3 patients out of 9 diagnosed with probable invasive aspergillosis yielded negative results after repetition.
CONCLUSIONS: Our study shows poor reproducibility of the positive samples for the Platelia™ Aspergillus test. These results reinforce the need to evaluate a second sample and to consider simultaneously repeating the first positive serum to enhance the diagnosis of invasive fungal infection.
AIMS: To evaluate the repeated results of the Platelia™ Aspergillus test on initially positive samples, and their association with clinical and microbiological studies.
METHODS: A total of 150 positive sera belonging to 92 patients were studied. More than one positive sample was obtained from 31 (33.6%) patients. Nine patients were diagnosed with probable invasive aspergillosis and two with proven Fusarium oxysporum and Scedosporium prolificans invasive fungal infection, respectively.
RESULTS: Only 35 out of 150 (23.3%) sera remained positive upon test repetition. The average OD-index difference between the initially positive and subsequently negative samples was 0.76. Sera from 3 patients out of 9 diagnosed with probable invasive aspergillosis yielded negative results after repetition.
CONCLUSIONS: Our study shows poor reproducibility of the positive samples for the Platelia™ Aspergillus test. These results reinforce the need to evaluate a second sample and to consider simultaneously repeating the first positive serum to enhance the diagnosis of invasive fungal infection.