The journal of contemporary dental practice · 2025
Comparative Evaluation of SFRC and Bulk-fill Resin Composite Restoration in Primary Posterior Teeth: An In Vivo Study.
СтатьяСравнительное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Vardhana Bharath, Shree Prabha, Subramaniam Priya, Bal Sourav Chandra Bidyasagar, Singh Bismay, Swain Jnana R, Chopra Meenakshi
Аннотация
AIM: The aim of the study was to evaluate the clinical performance of composite restorations restored by short fiber-reinforced and bulk-fill resin composites in the primary posterior teeth.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study was conducted on 100 primary molars in children aged from 6 to 10 years having occlusal caries. Selected 100 primary molars were randomly divided into two groups, group A (EXF) and group B (TNC). Teeth were clinically evaluated using United States Public Health Service (USPHS) criteria.
RESULTS: Bulk-fill composite showed marginal disintegration compared to short fiber-reinforced composite (SFRC). No significant difference was observed for other parameters evaluated under USPHS criteria at different follow-up periods except for marginal adaptation favoring the SFRC at 3 and 6 months.
CONCLUSION: This study supports SRFC as a preferable material choice over bulk-fill composite resin, offering valuable guidance to dental professionals in clinical decision-making.
CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: Incorporation of short glass fibers in Ever X Flow enhances marginal adaptability and minimizes microleakage at restorative margins. How to cite this article: Vardhana B, Shree P, Subramaniam P, et al. Comparative Evaluation of SFRC and Bulk-fill Resin Composite Restoration in Primary Posterior Teeth: An In Vivo Study. J Contemp Dent Pract 2025;26(3):229-233.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study was conducted on 100 primary molars in children aged from 6 to 10 years having occlusal caries. Selected 100 primary molars were randomly divided into two groups, group A (EXF) and group B (TNC). Teeth were clinically evaluated using United States Public Health Service (USPHS) criteria.
RESULTS: Bulk-fill composite showed marginal disintegration compared to short fiber-reinforced composite (SFRC). No significant difference was observed for other parameters evaluated under USPHS criteria at different follow-up periods except for marginal adaptation favoring the SFRC at 3 and 6 months.
CONCLUSION: This study supports SRFC as a preferable material choice over bulk-fill composite resin, offering valuable guidance to dental professionals in clinical decision-making.
CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: Incorporation of short glass fibers in Ever X Flow enhances marginal adaptability and minimizes microleakage at restorative margins. How to cite this article: Vardhana B, Shree P, Subramaniam P, et al. Comparative Evaluation of SFRC and Bulk-fill Resin Composite Restoration in Primary Posterior Teeth: An In Vivo Study. J Contemp Dent Pract 2025;26(3):229-233.