Epilepsia · 2002
Different neurophysiologic patterns of myoclonus characterize Lennox-Gastaut syndrome and myoclonic astatic epilepsy.
Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Bonanni Paolo, Parmeggiani Lucio, Guerrini Renzo
Аннотация
PURPOSE: To study the neurophysiologic characteristics of epileptic myoclonus in patients with Lennox-Gastaut syndrome (LGS) and myoclonic astatic epilepsy (MAE).
METHODS: Three patients with symptomatic LGS (mean age, 15 years +/- 4) and three with cryptogenic MAE (mean age, 9 years +/- 3) were studied. Temporal relationships between electroencephalographic (EEG) and electromyographic activity were studied by analyzing latencies of EEG activity related to the onset of single myoclonic jerks, by using burst-locked EEG averaging where necessary.
RESULTS: LGS: neurophysiologic analysis indicated that jerks and the accompanying premyoclonic spikes showed latency differences between sides (mean +/- SD, 18 +/- 5 ms for both) with a constant leading side in each patient. The premyoclonic spike latency was 20 +/- 10 ms (mean +/- SD). Topographic voltage mapping of the premyoclonic spike peak showed a unilateral frontal distribution. MAE: muscles from both sides were activated synchronously, and the EEG correlate was a generalized spike-wave, in which the negative peak of the spike preceded the generalized jerks by 30 +/- 2 ms (mean +/- SD). Topographic voltage mapping of the premyoclonic spike peak showed a diffuse distribution of the electrical field, predominating over the anterior regions, but not lateralized.
CONCLUSIONS: These neurophysiologic findings indicate that epileptic myoclonus in LGS originates from a stable generator in the frontal cortex, to spread to contralateral and ipsilateral cortical areas, whereas myoclonus in MAE appears to be a primary generalized epileptic phenomenon.
METHODS: Three patients with symptomatic LGS (mean age, 15 years +/- 4) and three with cryptogenic MAE (mean age, 9 years +/- 3) were studied. Temporal relationships between electroencephalographic (EEG) and electromyographic activity were studied by analyzing latencies of EEG activity related to the onset of single myoclonic jerks, by using burst-locked EEG averaging where necessary.
RESULTS: LGS: neurophysiologic analysis indicated that jerks and the accompanying premyoclonic spikes showed latency differences between sides (mean +/- SD, 18 +/- 5 ms for both) with a constant leading side in each patient. The premyoclonic spike latency was 20 +/- 10 ms (mean +/- SD). Topographic voltage mapping of the premyoclonic spike peak showed a unilateral frontal distribution. MAE: muscles from both sides were activated synchronously, and the EEG correlate was a generalized spike-wave, in which the negative peak of the spike preceded the generalized jerks by 30 +/- 2 ms (mean +/- SD). Topographic voltage mapping of the premyoclonic spike peak showed a diffuse distribution of the electrical field, predominating over the anterior regions, but not lateralized.
CONCLUSIONS: These neurophysiologic findings indicate that epileptic myoclonus in LGS originates from a stable generator in the frontal cortex, to spread to contralateral and ipsilateral cortical areas, whereas myoclonus in MAE appears to be a primary generalized epileptic phenomenon.