MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций
Медицинская библиотека · Neurosurgery · 2005

Neuroendovascular interventions for intracranial posterior circulation disease via the transradial approach: technical case report.

Bendok Bernard R, Przybylo Jason H, Parkinson Richard, Hu Yin, Awad Issam A, Batjer H Hunt

Клинический случайСтатьяОбзорПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE AND

IMPORTANCE

To describe our experience with the transradial approach for posterior circulation neurointerventional procedures. To the best of our knowledge, this approach has not been described previously for intracranial neuroendovascular procedures.

CLINICAL PRESENTATION: The clinical and imaging characteristics as well as periprocedural outcomes of patients treated for intracranial posterior circulation disease via the transradial approach were analyzed retrospectively.

INTERVENTION: Between January 1 and October 21, 2003, four patients with posterior circulation disease (aneurysm, n = 1, and atherosclerotic stenosis, n = 3) were treated via the transradial approach because of tortuous brachiocephalic anatomy. Procedural success was 100%, and there were no procedural complications. No technical difficulties were encountered.

CONCLUSION

The transradial approach is an alternative to the femoral approach for posterior circulation neuroendovascular intervention. This approach has several advantages over other approaches, and the vasculature can be less tortuous than that encountered during the femoral approach. These factors can result in increased device trackability and procedural ease.

Для цитирования: Bendok Bernard R, Przybylo Jason H, Parkinson Richard, Hu Yin, Awad Issam A, Batjer H Hunt. Neuroendovascular interventions for intracranial posterior circulation disease via the transradial approach: technical case report.. Neurosurgery. 2005.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.