Lymphatic research and biology · 2019
Small Peptide Modulation of Fibroblast Growth Factor Receptor 3-Dependent Postnatal Lymphangiogenesis.
СтатьяПоддержка NIH: внешняя программаНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Perrault David P, Lee Gene K, Park Sun Young, Lee Sunju, Choi Dongwon, Jung Eunson, Seong Young Jin, Park Eun Kyung, Sung Cynthia, Yu Roy, Bouz Antoun, Pourmoussa Austin, Kim Soo Jung, Hong Young-Kwon, Wong Alex K
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: The fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR) family includes transmembrane receptors involved in a wide range of developmental and postdevelopmental biologic processes as well as a wide range of human diseases. In particular, FGFR3 has been implicated in the mechanism by which 9-cis retinoic acid (9-cisRA) induces lymphangiogenesis and improves lymphedema. The purpose of this study was to validate the efficacy of a novel small peptide FGFR3 inhibitor, peptide P3 (VSPPLTLGQLLS), and to elucidate the role of FGFR3 in 9-cisRA-induced lymphangiogenesis using this peptide.
METHODS AND RESULTS: Peptide P3 effectively inhibited FGFR3 phosphorylation. In vitro, peptide P3-mediated FGFR3 inhibition did not decrease lymphatic endothelial cell (LEC) proliferation, migration, or tubule formation. However, peptide P3-mediated FGFR3 inhibition did block 9-cisRA-stimulated LEC proliferation, migration, and tubule formation. In vivo, peptide P3-mediated FGFR3 inhibition was sufficient to inhibit 9-cisRA-induced tracheal lymphangiogenesis.
CONCLUSION: FGFR3 does not appear to be essential to nonpromoted LEC proliferation, migration, and tubule formation. However, FGFR3 may play a key role in LEC proliferation, migration, tubule formation, and postnatal in vivo lymphangiogenesis when pharmacologically induced by 9-cisRA. P3 may have the potential to be used as a precise regulatory control element for 9-cisRA-mediated lymphangiogenesis.
METHODS AND RESULTS: Peptide P3 effectively inhibited FGFR3 phosphorylation. In vitro, peptide P3-mediated FGFR3 inhibition did not decrease lymphatic endothelial cell (LEC) proliferation, migration, or tubule formation. However, peptide P3-mediated FGFR3 inhibition did block 9-cisRA-stimulated LEC proliferation, migration, and tubule formation. In vivo, peptide P3-mediated FGFR3 inhibition was sufficient to inhibit 9-cisRA-induced tracheal lymphangiogenesis.
CONCLUSION: FGFR3 does not appear to be essential to nonpromoted LEC proliferation, migration, and tubule formation. However, FGFR3 may play a key role in LEC proliferation, migration, tubule formation, and postnatal in vivo lymphangiogenesis when pharmacologically induced by 9-cisRA. P3 may have the potential to be used as a precise regulatory control element for 9-cisRA-mediated lymphangiogenesis.