MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций
Медицинская библиотека · Zhongguo xiu fu chong jian wai ke za zhi = Zhongguo xiufu chongjian waike zazhi = Chinese journal of reparative and reconstructive surgery · 2004

[Analyses of epidemiology in 363 cases of clavicle fractures].

Zhu Xianghui, Li Weiping, Chen Zijie

Аннотация на английскомСтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE

To analyze the epidemiological features of clavicle fractures.

METHODS

A total of 363 cases of clavicle fractures were treated from February 1993 to November 2002, their case history data were reviewed and evaluated by epidemiological method.

RESULTS

Out of 363 cases, there were 269 males and 94 females, aged from new born to 96 years. The locations of fractures were on left side in 159 cases and on right side in 204 cases. Neonatal clavicle fracture occurred in the case of delivery (0.28%). The causes of disease for adult clavicle fractures were traffic injury (52.1%) and daily falling injury (31.1%). There were 232 cases of simple fractures and 131 cases of comminuted fractures. The fracture positions included inner (6 cases), middle (328 cases) and outer parts (29 cases). Multi-injuries occurred in 78 cases, the rib fractures concomitant with clavicle fractures were the commonest (31 cases).

CONCLUSION

The clavicle fractures are the common injury. Of them, traffic injury and daily falling injury are the most common. The rib fractures are always accompanied with clavicle fractures. The main position of fracture is on the middle part.

Для цитирования: Zhu Xianghui, Li Weiping, Chen Zijie. [Analyses of epidemiology in 363 cases of clavicle fractures].. Zhongguo xiu fu chong jian wai ke za zhi = Zhongguo xiufu chongjian waike zazhi = Chinese journal of reparative and reconstructive surgery. 2004.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.