m+Medelevator.RU
← Поиск публикаций
Nature communications · 2025

Camrelizumab plus chemotherapy versus chemoradiotherapy as neoadjuvant therapy for resectable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: Phase 2 randomized trial (REVO).

СтатьяКлиническое исследование II фазыРандомизированное исследованиеМногоцентровое исследованиеСравнительное исследованиеEquivalence TrialНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Wang Peiyuan, Chen Yujie, Wang Feng, Chen Mingqiu, Zheng Buhong, Zhang Derong, Zheng Qingfeng, Wang Jiezhong, Chen Junqiang, Cai Huaxin, Liu Junhua, Zhang Wenshan, Lian Changhong, Chen Juhui, Lin Yu, Xu Yuanji, Huang Rongfang, Lei Mengxia, Chen Peng, He Hao, Lin Hui, Chen Xiaofeng, Zhou Hang, Chen Weijie, Wei Wenwei, Zhuang Fengnian, Lin Junpeng, Huang Canhua, Guan Ni, Yan Jin, Liang Shujun, Liu Shuoyan, Li Jiancheng

Аннотация

Several studies have evaluated PD-1 inhibitors plus chemotherapy as neoadjuvant treatment for locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC), but comparative data with chemoradiotherapy (CRT) remain limited. This multicenter, randomized, open-label, phase 2 non-inferiority trial (REVO, NCT05007145) assessed the efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant camrelizumab plus chemotherapy (ICT) versus CRT in patients with resectable, locally advanced ESCC. A total of 104 patients were randomized to ICT (camrelizumab, nab-paclitaxel, cisplatin) or CRT (nab-paclitaxel, cisplatin, radiotherapy). The primary endpoint was pathologic complete response (pCR). ICT achieved a pCR rate of 32.7% versus 34.6% with CRT (rate ratio 0.94, 90% CI 0.6-1.49), demonstrating non-inferiority and meeting the pre-specified primary endpoint. Major pathologic response was observed in 42.3% of ICT patients and 57.7% of CRT patients, with R0 resection achieved in 100% of both groups. 1-year disease-free survival was 89.1% versus 78.2%, and 1-year overall survival was 100% versus 92.3% for ICT and CRT, respectively. Grade ≥3 treatment-related adverse events occurred in 19.2% of ICT patients and 33.3% of CRT patients, and surgical complications were reported in 31.1% and 35.9%, respectively. These findings indicate that ICT is a safe and effective neoadjuvant strategy for resectable ESCC with a more favorable safety profile.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

ИП Урсолов Владлен Сергеевич

ИНН 500118482352 · ОГРНИП 314500117700049

Реквизиты и контакты