MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1002/ppul.26602

Медицинская библиотека · Pediatric pulmonology · 2023

Unsupervised home spirometry is not equivalent to supervised clinic spirometry in children and young people with cystic fibrosis: Results from the CLIMB-CF study.

Edmondson Claire, Westrupp Nicole, Short Christopher, Seddon Paul, Olden Catherine, Wallis Colin, Brodlie Malcolm, Baxter Francis, McCormick Jonathan, MacFarlane Susan, Brooker Richard, Connon Margaret, Ghayyda Salim, Blaikie Lesley, Thursfield Rebecca, Brown Lynsey, Price April, Fleischer Erin, Hughes Daniel, Donnelly Christine, Rosenthal Mark, Wallenburg John, Brownlee Keith, Alton Eric W F W, Bush Andrew, Davies Jane C

СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Handheld spirometry allows monitoring of lung function at home, of particular importance during the COVID-19 pandemic. Pediatric studies are unclear on whether values are interchangeable with traditional, clinic-based spirometry. We aimed to assess differences between contemporaneous, home (unsupervised) and clinic (supervised) spirometry and the variability of the former. The accuracy of the commercially available spirometer used in the study was also tested.

METHODS

Data from participants in the Clinical Monitoring and Biomarkers to stratify severity and predict outcomes in children with cystic fibrosisc (CLIMB-CF) Study aged ≥ 6 years who had paired (±1 day) clinic and home forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1 ) readings were analyzed. Variability during clinical stability over 6-months was assessed. Four devices from Vitalograph were tested using 1 and 3 L calibration syringes.

RESULTS

Sixty-seven participants (median [interquartile range] age 10.7 [7.6-13.9] years) provided home and clinic FEV1 data pairs. The mean (SD) FEV1 % bias was 6.5% [±8.2%]) with wide limits of agreement (-9.6% to +22.7%); 76.2% of participants recorded lower results at home. Coefficient of variation of home FEV1 % during stable periods was 9.9%. Data from the testing of the handheld device used in CLIMB-CF showed a potential underread.

CONCLUSION

In children and adolescents, home spirometry using hand-held equipment cannot be used interchangeably with clinic spirometry. Home spirometry is moderately variable during clinical stability. New handheld devices underread, particularly at lower volumes of potential clinical significance for smaller patients; this suggests that supervision does not account fully for the discrepancy. Opportunities should be taken to obtain dual device measurements in clinic, so that trend data from home can be utilized more accurately.

Для цитирования: Edmondson Claire, Westrupp Nicole, Short Christopher, Seddon Paul, Olden Catherine, Wallis Colin, Brodlie Malcolm, Baxter Francis, McCormick Jonathan, MacFarlane Susan, Brooker Richard, Connon Margaret, Ghayyda Salim, Blaikie Lesley, Thursfield Rebecca, Brown Lynsey, Price April, Fleischer Erin, Hughes Daniel, Donnelly Christine, Rosenthal Mark, Wallenburg John, Brownlee Keith, Alton Eric W F W, Bush Andrew, Davies Jane C. Unsupervised home spirometry is not equivalent to supervised clinic spirometry in children and young people with cystic fibrosis: Results from the CLIMB-CF study.. Pediatric pulmonology. 2023. DOI: 10.1002/ppul.26602.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.