Neurorehabilitation and neural repair · 2001
Measuring subluxation of the hemiplegic shoulder: reliability of a method.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Snels I A, Beckerman H, ten Kate J J, Lankhorst G J, Bouter L M
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: Subluxation of the shoulder after stroke can be measured according to the method described by Van Langenberghe and Hogan.
METHODS: To evaluate the reliability of this method, the shoulder radiographs of 25 patients were available for this study. Two independent raters each assessed these radiographs twice.
RESULTS: The intrarater reliability was good: percentage of agreement was 88 and 84%, weighted kappa, 0.69 [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.38-1.0] and 0.78 (95% CI, 0.60-0.95) for raters 1 and 2, respectively. The interrater reliability was poor: percentage of agreement was 36 and 28%, kappa, 0.11 (95% CI, 0.0-0.31) and 0.09 (95% CI, 0.0-0.23) in sessions 1 and 2, respectively. Subsequently the original method was adjusted by combining two categories (no subluxation and beginning subluxation) into one ("no clinically important subluxation").
CONCLUSIONS: After this adjustment of the categories, the interrater reliability improved [percentage of agreement, 72%, and kappa, 0.49 (95% CI, 0.18-0.80)], but did not reach acceptable values.
METHODS: To evaluate the reliability of this method, the shoulder radiographs of 25 patients were available for this study. Two independent raters each assessed these radiographs twice.
RESULTS: The intrarater reliability was good: percentage of agreement was 88 and 84%, weighted kappa, 0.69 [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.38-1.0] and 0.78 (95% CI, 0.60-0.95) for raters 1 and 2, respectively. The interrater reliability was poor: percentage of agreement was 36 and 28%, kappa, 0.11 (95% CI, 0.0-0.31) and 0.09 (95% CI, 0.0-0.23) in sessions 1 and 2, respectively. Subsequently the original method was adjusted by combining two categories (no subluxation and beginning subluxation) into one ("no clinically important subluxation").
CONCLUSIONS: After this adjustment of the categories, the interrater reliability improved [percentage of agreement, 72%, and kappa, 0.49 (95% CI, 0.18-0.80)], but did not reach acceptable values.