DOI 10.1016/j.bulcan.2016.11.007
[Incidence and risk factors for ifosfamide-related encephalopathy in sarcoma patients].
Аннотация
CONTEXT: Ifosfamide remains one of the major cytotoxic drugs for sarcoma management. Ifosfamid-related encephalopathy (IRE) is a rare but severe adverse event, without clearly identified risk factors.
METHOD: We have carried out a single-center, retrospective study to assess the occurrence and the risk factors for IRE after the two first cycles of chemotherapy. We have collected the data-describing patients, biological data, tumors characteristics (histology, leptomeningeal metastasis) and ifosfamide administration modalities.
RESULTS
From September 2008 to November 2013, we have identified 8 IRE out of 187 patients (4.2% [CI95%: 1.8-8.2]). The median age was 27 (0-78). Histologies were adult soft tissue sarcomas (78 patients), osteosarcoma (48), ewing sarcoma (41) and rhabdomyosarcoma (26). Most of factors were not associated with IRE. Only 8 patients have received aprepitant, none of them experienced IRE. Under univariate analysis, the risk factors for IRE were: PS≥2 (OR=9.52 [CI95%: 2.38-38.80]), albumin≤36g/L (OR=9.79 [CI95%: 1.19-80.26]), leptomeningeal metastasis (OR=13.20 [CI95%: 2.76-63.19]), 4 or 5 successive days of ifosfamide administration (OR=6.00 [CI95%: 1.40-25.60]). Under multivariate analysis, the risk factors for IE were: PS≥2 (OR=16.00 [IC95%: 2.80-67.00]), leptomeningial metastasis (OR=23.56 [IC95%: 2.01-456.80]) and 4 or 5 days of ifosfamide administration (OR=57.45 [IC95%: 1.66-35.00]).
CONCLUSION
Ifosfamide administration must be given with caution in patients with poor performans status. A 4 to 5 days fractioned ifosfamide and leptomeningeal metastasis seems associated with increased risk for IRE, whatever the total administered dose.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.