MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.wneu.2016.08.049

Медицинская библиотека · World neurosurgery · 2016

Intracranial Extraskeletal Mesenchymal Chondrosarcoma.

Sadashiva Nishanth, Sharma Anil, Shukla Dhaval, Rajalakshmi Poyuran, Mahadevan Anita, Devi Bhagavatula Indira

Клинический случайСтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Intracranial extraskeletal mesenchymal chondrosarcomas (MCSs) are rare tumors accounting for <0.16% of intracranial tumors. They are usually described as occurring in the age group of 20-30 years and are commonly found in the frontoparietal region arising from the falx and surrounding dura. We describe 3 cases at varying ages, locations, and outcomes.

CASE DESCRIPTION: A 42-year-old woman with anterior one third falx-based lesion; a 7-year-old boy with mid one third falcine lesion with hyperostosis of bone, presenting in comatose stage; and a 52-year-old woman with left posterior lateral frontal dural-based lesion are presented. Histopathology of all cases was confirmed with immunohistochemistry. All patients underwent complete excision but had varying outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

Intracranial MCSs are rare malignant tumors with poor prognosis. Because of their rarity, it may not be considered as a differential diagnosis and it is often misdiagnosed radiologically, but the importance lies in the need of radical excision. The potential effect of postoperative radiotherapy and chemotherapy is controversial. This article sheds some light on variable prognosis of this tumor.

Для цитирования: Sadashiva Nishanth, Sharma Anil, Shukla Dhaval, Rajalakshmi Poyuran, Mahadevan Anita, Devi Bhagavatula Indira. Intracranial Extraskeletal Mesenchymal Chondrosarcoma.. World neurosurgery. 2016. DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2016.08.049.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.