MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций
Медицинская библиотека · Tidsskrift for den Norske laegeforening : tidsskrift for praktisk medicin, ny raekke · 1998

[Is there a physician on board?].

Andersen H T

КомментарийАннотация на английскомСтатьяОбзорПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

Physicians responding to emergency calls on board airliners in intercontinental traffic may not be aware of certain legal complications which may arise. For instance, the medical practitioner may hold a license valid in one country, the air carrier may be registered in another, and the patient may be a third state national. Legislation varies between nations, as do courts decisions. Physicians may not be aware of the laws and regulations which apply or of the subtle differences between terms and interpretations used in formal language. This article contains a scenario description from a commercial air liner in intercontinental transit carrying a patient unknown to the physician who responds to a call for medical assistance. The main considerations to be made, the more likely diagnoses and various strategies for immediate interventions are reviewed. Likewise, appraisal and use of medical equipment on board are discussed, as are issues concerning responsibility and liability when equipment is used in supposedly "trained hands". Main themes in the current international medico-legal debate are considered with emphasis on the "Good Samaritan Principle", the responsibility of commercial air carriers, and telemedicine with insurance against law suits. The article concludes with some practical advice to the travelling medical community.

Для цитирования: Andersen H T. [Is there a physician on board?].. Tidsskrift for den Norske laegeforening : tidsskrift for praktisk medicin, ny raekke. 1998.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.