MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1136/bcr-2020-234724

Медицинская библиотека · BMJ case reports · 2020

Central diabetes insipidus caused by a pituitary stalk germinoma resembling infundibuloneurohypophysitis.

Dias Daniela, Vilar Helena, Passos João, Leite Valeriano

Клинический случайСтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

We report the case of a pituitary stalk germinoma initially misdiagnosed and treated as infundibuloneurohypophysitis (INH). A 27-year-old man presented with a 1-year history of polydipsia, polyuria, nycturia consistent with central diabetes insipidus and a hyperintense pituitary stalk lesion on MRI. A possible INH diagnosis was considered, after excluding other pathologies. Lesion biopsy was discarded at that time on the ground of a small target and the high risk of added morbidity. Oral desmopressin led to initial symptoms resolution but, in the following months, an anterior panhypopituitarism developed, in spite of appropriate treatment and, by that time, the brain MRI also revealed lesion growth, which prompted a biopsy recommendation. The pathology analysis revealed a germinoma. After chemotherapy and radiotherapy, there was complete disappearance of the pituitary lesion, but the panhypopituitarism persisted. In conclusion, this case highlights the importance and difficulty of precise diagnosis in the initial assessment of pituitary stalk lesions and the need for close monitoring of treatment response. Diagnostic reassessment and biopsy in atypical cases is the only path to achieve the correct diagnosis and treatment.

Для цитирования: Dias Daniela, Vilar Helena, Passos João, Leite Valeriano. Central diabetes insipidus caused by a pituitary stalk germinoma resembling infundibuloneurohypophysitis.. BMJ case reports. 2020. DOI: 10.1136/bcr-2020-234724.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.