The Journal of the Association of Physicians of India · 2014
Echocardiographic assessment of cardiac dysfunction in patients of end stage renal disease on haemodialysis.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Laddha Mukesh, Sachdeva Vishal, Diggikar P M, Satpathy P K, Kakrani A L
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: To assess the prevalence of systolic and diastolic dysfunction in patients of end stage renal disease (ESRD) on haemodialysis.
METHODS: Seventy patients with ESRD were subjected to two-dimensional and M mode echocardiography for determination of systolic and diastolic dysfunction. All patients were evaluated clinically, biochemically and radiologically and were diagnosed as chronic kidney disease (CKD). The left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and fractional shortening (FS) were taken as measures of left ventricular (LV) systolic function. Diastolic function was determined by measuring E/A ratio by spectral doppler LV inflow velocity. Echocardiographic findings of hypertensive and normotensive patients were compared.
RESULTS: Out of 70 patients studied, there were 53 males (75.7%) and 17 females (24.3%). Hypertension (37.1%) was leading cause of ESRD. Echocardiography showed that left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) was present in 74.3%. Systolic dysfunction as measured by reduced fractional shortening (<25%) and decreased LVEF (< 50%) was present in 8.6% and 24.3% respectively. Diastolic dysfunction as denoted by E/A ratio of less than 0.75 or more than 1.8 was present in 61.4% of patients. Regional wall motion abnormality (RWMA) was present in 12.9%. Pericardial effusion was noted in 14.3% of patients. Valvular calcification was noted in 7.1% of ESRD patients. Mean left ventricular internal diameter in diastole was 45.55 +/- 6.03 mm. Mean Interventricular septum diameters in systole was 12.2 +/- 1.71 mm. Mean left atrium diameter was 33.01 +/- 4.11 mm. Normotensive group was compared to hypertensive group. Statistically significant difference was noted in LVH and E/A ratio in hypertensive group as compared to normotensive group.
CONCLUSION: Patients with hypertensive ESRD had higher prevalence of diastolic and systolic dysfunction as compared to normotensive counterparts.
METHODS: Seventy patients with ESRD were subjected to two-dimensional and M mode echocardiography for determination of systolic and diastolic dysfunction. All patients were evaluated clinically, biochemically and radiologically and were diagnosed as chronic kidney disease (CKD). The left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and fractional shortening (FS) were taken as measures of left ventricular (LV) systolic function. Diastolic function was determined by measuring E/A ratio by spectral doppler LV inflow velocity. Echocardiographic findings of hypertensive and normotensive patients were compared.
RESULTS: Out of 70 patients studied, there were 53 males (75.7%) and 17 females (24.3%). Hypertension (37.1%) was leading cause of ESRD. Echocardiography showed that left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) was present in 74.3%. Systolic dysfunction as measured by reduced fractional shortening (<25%) and decreased LVEF (< 50%) was present in 8.6% and 24.3% respectively. Diastolic dysfunction as denoted by E/A ratio of less than 0.75 or more than 1.8 was present in 61.4% of patients. Regional wall motion abnormality (RWMA) was present in 12.9%. Pericardial effusion was noted in 14.3% of patients. Valvular calcification was noted in 7.1% of ESRD patients. Mean left ventricular internal diameter in diastole was 45.55 +/- 6.03 mm. Mean Interventricular septum diameters in systole was 12.2 +/- 1.71 mm. Mean left atrium diameter was 33.01 +/- 4.11 mm. Normotensive group was compared to hypertensive group. Statistically significant difference was noted in LVH and E/A ratio in hypertensive group as compared to normotensive group.
CONCLUSION: Patients with hypertensive ESRD had higher prevalence of diastolic and systolic dysfunction as compared to normotensive counterparts.