Radiology · 1994
Transabdominal manually assisted reduction of pediatric intussusception: reappraisal of this historical technique.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Grasso S N, Katz M E, Presberg H J, Croitoru D P
Аннотация
PURPOSE: To determine whether manual manipulation of the abdomen during intussusception reduction improves the success rate or affects morbidity.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective study was performed in 38 cases of intussusception in 35 children over a 33-month period at a pediatric hospital. In all cases, pneumostatic pressure was used as the initial method of treatment. A comparative review of the intussusception literature was also performed.
RESULTS: Reduction was achieved with pneumostatic pressure alone in 22 cases (an initial success rate of 58%). Transabdominal manual manipulation was used in 10 cases after initial pneumostatic reduction failed; seven of these 10 cases were treated successfully. These seven additional successes, attributed to manual assistance, significantly improved the success rate from 58% to 76% (P < .016). No perforation or other complication occurred.
CONCLUSION: These results and findings of the literature review indicate that transabdominal manual assistance during reduction is a potentially useful technique that has been shunned without scientific basis for longer than 40 years.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective study was performed in 38 cases of intussusception in 35 children over a 33-month period at a pediatric hospital. In all cases, pneumostatic pressure was used as the initial method of treatment. A comparative review of the intussusception literature was also performed.
RESULTS: Reduction was achieved with pneumostatic pressure alone in 22 cases (an initial success rate of 58%). Transabdominal manual manipulation was used in 10 cases after initial pneumostatic reduction failed; seven of these 10 cases were treated successfully. These seven additional successes, attributed to manual assistance, significantly improved the success rate from 58% to 76% (P < .016). No perforation or other complication occurred.
CONCLUSION: These results and findings of the literature review indicate that transabdominal manual assistance during reduction is a potentially useful technique that has been shunned without scientific basis for longer than 40 years.