DOI 10.1902/jop.2002.73.12.1534
Histological evaluation of 4 cases of root coverage following a connective tissue graft combined with an enamel matrix derivative preparation.
Аннотация
BACKGROUND
The purpose of this report was to evaluate the histological characteristics of 4 clinically successful root coverage procedures performed with a combination of a connective tissue (CT) graft and an enamel matrix derivative (EMD) preparation.
METHODS
Four maxillary teeth (3 canines and 1) first premolar) that presented with mucogingival problems and Miller's Class II and III gingival recession were evaluated in the study. Surgical therapy for root coverage consisted of autogenous CT grafts combined with the topical application of EMD. Following healing, treated teeth were extracted with a portion of their buccal attachment apparatus. Two teeth were extracted at 6 months and 2 teeth at 1 year postoperatively. Specimens were prepared for histology and analyzed by light microscopy.
RESULTS
All treated teeth presented with clinical signs of successful root coverage. Histological observations of the 4 specimens revealed similar findings. The junctional epithelium was < or = 2 mm long. Apical to the junctional epithelium, dense CT fibers were found in close proximity to the root surface, but in general, no insertion of these fibers into the root was observed. In one 6-month specimen, formation of new cementum and new bone was observed in the most apical end of the grafted area.
CONCLUSIONS
The results of this study suggest that a combination of CT grafts and EMD results mainly in an adhesion between the CT and root surface. Some periodontal regeneration may occur in some regions. The development of a long junctional epithelium was not observed with this combined therapy for the treatment of gingival recession.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.