Eye (London, England) · 2025
Efficacy and safety of robotic Cyberknife radiotherapy in uveal melanoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
СтатьяСистематический обзорМетаанализПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Du Kejie, Luo Wenjuan
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES: This systematic review is aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of robotic Cyberknife radiotherapy (CKRT) in the treatment of uveal melanoma (UM).
METHODS: Clinical studies published in English that assessed the efficacy and safety of robotic CKRT in UM were systematically searched in PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane and Embase from inception to July 2023. Studies reporting extraocular tumours or other radiosurgery approaches were excluded. Outcomes measured were tumour size, reflectivity, local tumour control rate, eye retention rate, survival rate, complication rate, recurrence rate, and metastasis rate.
RESULTS: Ten eligible articles involving 2370 patients with 2372 UMs were included in evidence synthesis. Meta-analysis showed 811 of 912 patients (0.89, 95% Cl: 0.86, 0.92) maintained local control for three years, and 1448 of 1724 patients (0.84, 95% Cl: 0.81, 0.88) preserved the eye in three years. During follow-up, 91% (0.91, 95% Cl: 0.85, 0.97) patients survived and 351 of 1720 patients (0.23, 95% Cl: 0.09, 0.37) involving 1722 eyes had tumour recurrence. In addition, 1376 patients (0.79, 95% Cl: 0.77, 0.82) preserved the eyeball in five years. Following treatment, approximately 20% of patients had radiation retinopathy (95% Cl: 0.13, 0.28), 19% developed glaucoma (95% Cl: 0.11, 0.28), and 22% experienced retinal detachment (95% Cl: 0.07, 0.36).
CONCLUSIONS: CKRT is a viable, noninvasive RT for UM. The rate of local tumour control following treatment is comparable to that of other RT approaches, providing additional options based on the patient's condition.
METHODS: Clinical studies published in English that assessed the efficacy and safety of robotic CKRT in UM were systematically searched in PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane and Embase from inception to July 2023. Studies reporting extraocular tumours or other radiosurgery approaches were excluded. Outcomes measured were tumour size, reflectivity, local tumour control rate, eye retention rate, survival rate, complication rate, recurrence rate, and metastasis rate.
RESULTS: Ten eligible articles involving 2370 patients with 2372 UMs were included in evidence synthesis. Meta-analysis showed 811 of 912 patients (0.89, 95% Cl: 0.86, 0.92) maintained local control for three years, and 1448 of 1724 patients (0.84, 95% Cl: 0.81, 0.88) preserved the eye in three years. During follow-up, 91% (0.91, 95% Cl: 0.85, 0.97) patients survived and 351 of 1720 patients (0.23, 95% Cl: 0.09, 0.37) involving 1722 eyes had tumour recurrence. In addition, 1376 patients (0.79, 95% Cl: 0.77, 0.82) preserved the eyeball in five years. Following treatment, approximately 20% of patients had radiation retinopathy (95% Cl: 0.13, 0.28), 19% developed glaucoma (95% Cl: 0.11, 0.28), and 22% experienced retinal detachment (95% Cl: 0.07, 0.36).
CONCLUSIONS: CKRT is a viable, noninvasive RT for UM. The rate of local tumour control following treatment is comparable to that of other RT approaches, providing additional options based on the patient's condition.