MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1002/lary.23772

Медицинская библиотека · The Laryngoscope · 2013

Results of myringoplasty operations in active and inactive ears in adults.

Mills Robert, Thiel Gundula, Mills Nadtaya

Сравнительное исследованиеОценочное исследованиеСтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: To determine whether the presence of aural discharge at the time of surgery adversely affects the success rate of myringoplasty operations.

STUDY

DESIGN

Case series comparing the success rate of surgery in active and inactive ears.

METHODS

Data pertaining to 268 operations involving repair of the tympanic membrane without ossiculoplasty carried out in Edinburgh, United Kingdom, between 1999 and 2009 by one senior surgeon and trainees working under his supervision were collected prospectively. Other factors that might potentially influence the outcome of the surgery were investigated using logistical regression analysis. The main outcome measure was number of patients with an intact tympanic membrane 6 months after surgery in the two groups (active and inactive).

RESULTS

Of the 268 operations carried out, 203 were successful, with an intact tympanic membrane, 6 months postoperatively, 43 had persistent perforations, and 22 patients were lost to follow-up before 6 months. The success rates for closure of the perforation at 6 months after surgery were 83% for inactive and 82% for active ears (P = .9).

CONCLUSIONS

There is no clinically significant difference in the success rate for myringoplasty in patients whose ears are active or inactive at the time of surgery.

Для цитирования: Mills Robert, Thiel Gundula, Mills Nadtaya. Results of myringoplasty operations in active and inactive ears in adults.. The Laryngoscope. 2013. DOI: 10.1002/lary.23772.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.