Journal of endovascular therapy : an official journal of the International Society of Endovascular Specialists · 2015
Observations on surveillance imaging after endovascular sealing of abdominal aortic aneurysms with the Nellix system.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
McWilliams Richard G, Fisher Robert K, England Andrew, Torella Francesco
Аннотация
PURPOSE: To describe and interpret the findings of computed tomography images acquired before and after endovascular aneurysm sealing (EVAS) with the Nellix endoprosthesis and consider the potential implications of these findings on EVAS planning and performance.
METHODS: A retrospective review was performed of perioperative imaging from 30 consecutive patients (median age 79 years; 19 men) undergoing elective EVAS at our center between December 2013 and November 2014. The images were systematically reviewed specifically looking for endobag collapse, aortic thrombus compression, and aortic wall disruption according to definitions set a priori.
RESULTS: There was no perioperative mortality or endoleak after the EVAS procedure. Endobag collapse, which could potentially result in type II endoleak if occurring near a patent side branch, was seen in the endobags of 12 patients. Aortic thrombus compression, which affects the accuracy of preoperative volume measurements in predicting the amount of polymer needed to perform EVAS, was seen in 15 patients. There was one aortic wall disruption, which could potentially result in intraoperative hemorrhage, though this did not occur in this case.
CONCLUSION: These observations and their potential implications should help clinicians in planning and performing EVAS, as well as in interpreting postoperative imaging.
METHODS: A retrospective review was performed of perioperative imaging from 30 consecutive patients (median age 79 years; 19 men) undergoing elective EVAS at our center between December 2013 and November 2014. The images were systematically reviewed specifically looking for endobag collapse, aortic thrombus compression, and aortic wall disruption according to definitions set a priori.
RESULTS: There was no perioperative mortality or endoleak after the EVAS procedure. Endobag collapse, which could potentially result in type II endoleak if occurring near a patent side branch, was seen in the endobags of 12 patients. Aortic thrombus compression, which affects the accuracy of preoperative volume measurements in predicting the amount of polymer needed to perform EVAS, was seen in 15 patients. There was one aortic wall disruption, which could potentially result in intraoperative hemorrhage, though this did not occur in this case.
CONCLUSION: These observations and their potential implications should help clinicians in planning and performing EVAS, as well as in interpreting postoperative imaging.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
AgedAged, 80 and overAortic Aneurysm, AbdominalAortic RuptureAortographyBlood Vessel ProsthesisBlood Vessel Prosthesis ImplantationEndoleakEndovascular ProceduresEnglandFemaleHumansMalePredictive Value of TestsProsthesis DesignRetrospective StudiesStentsThrombosisTime FactorsTomography, X-Ray ComputedTreatment Outcome