Scandinavian journal of urology and nephrology · 2011
A short biodegradable helical spiral ureteric stent provides better antireflux and drainage properties than a double-J stent.
Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Lumiaho Juha, Heino Antero, Aaltomaa Sirpa, Välimaa Tero, Talja Martti
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: The use of ureteric stents is a standard treatment for the relief of ureter blockages for benign or malignant reasons. The most common stent design in clinical use is a double-J stent with coiled ends to avoid stent displacement. However, there are a number of complications associated with stent use. A double-J stent design bypasses the ureterovesical junction, enables bladder pressure reflection to the renal pelvis and causes vesicoureteral reflux (VUR). This may result in scarring and renal failure.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: An animal model was used to investigate whether VUR can be avoided in stented ureters using a short biodegradable partial helical spiral stent design that leaves the ureterovesical junction intact.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eight female pigs were used. Ureters on the left side were stented using a short helical spiral SR-PLGA stent (group A) and ureters on the right side using double-J stents (group B). Simulated voiding cystoureterography and standard intravenous urography examinations were performed on all eight animals at 4 weeks and on the remaining four animals at 8 weeks.
RESULTS: An SR-PLGA single coiled partial stent demonstrated superior drainage properties to a double-J stent at 4 weeks (p = 0.020). A marked but not statistically significant difference in favour of a SR-PLGA stent was also observed at 8 weeks (p = 0.102). A statistically significant difference was observed in VCUG findings in favour of group A at immediate postoperative control as well as in the 4 and 8 week follow-up studies (p = 0.011, p = 0.010, p = 0.046, respectively).
CONCLUSION: A self-expandable, SR-PLGA partial ureteric stent presented with superior drainage and antireflux properties compared to a double-J stent. The reflux commonly related to double-J stent use can be minimized by using a partial ureteric stent design.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: An animal model was used to investigate whether VUR can be avoided in stented ureters using a short biodegradable partial helical spiral stent design that leaves the ureterovesical junction intact.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eight female pigs were used. Ureters on the left side were stented using a short helical spiral SR-PLGA stent (group A) and ureters on the right side using double-J stents (group B). Simulated voiding cystoureterography and standard intravenous urography examinations were performed on all eight animals at 4 weeks and on the remaining four animals at 8 weeks.
RESULTS: An SR-PLGA single coiled partial stent demonstrated superior drainage properties to a double-J stent at 4 weeks (p = 0.020). A marked but not statistically significant difference in favour of a SR-PLGA stent was also observed at 8 weeks (p = 0.102). A statistically significant difference was observed in VCUG findings in favour of group A at immediate postoperative control as well as in the 4 and 8 week follow-up studies (p = 0.011, p = 0.010, p = 0.046, respectively).
CONCLUSION: A self-expandable, SR-PLGA partial ureteric stent presented with superior drainage and antireflux properties compared to a double-J stent. The reflux commonly related to double-J stent use can be minimized by using a partial ureteric stent design.