American journal of Alzheimer's disease and other dementias · 2014
Which rivastigmine formula is better for heart in elderly patients with Alzheimer's disease: oral or patch?
Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Isik Ahmet Turan, Soysal Pinar, Yay Adnan
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: Rivastigmine is commonly used for the treatment of Alzheimer's disease (AD). All cholinesterase inhibitors, including rivastigmine, may cause cardiac side effects. The aim of this study is to compare the electrocardiographic (ECG) and hypotensive effects of formulations of rivastigmine.
METHODS: Eighty-five newly diagnosed patients with AD who were treated with rivastigmine were retrospectively evaluated. The ECG records were reviewed at baseline and at administration of either 12 mg of oral rivastigmine or 10 cm(2) transdermal rivastigmine.
RESULTS: When compared with the baseline, there were no changes in any of the ECG parameters in all of the patients (P > .05). Moreover, when compared with the mean change from baseline for each treatment group, there were no changes, except heart rate (P = .035).
CONCLUSION: It was demonstrated that rivastigmine formulations were not associated with increased arrhythmogenic or hypotensive effects in elderly patients with AD and was not superior to each other.
METHODS: Eighty-five newly diagnosed patients with AD who were treated with rivastigmine were retrospectively evaluated. The ECG records were reviewed at baseline and at administration of either 12 mg of oral rivastigmine or 10 cm(2) transdermal rivastigmine.
RESULTS: When compared with the baseline, there were no changes in any of the ECG parameters in all of the patients (P > .05). Moreover, when compared with the mean change from baseline for each treatment group, there were no changes, except heart rate (P = .035).
CONCLUSION: It was demonstrated that rivastigmine formulations were not associated with increased arrhythmogenic or hypotensive effects in elderly patients with AD and was not superior to each other.