MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1002/mds.29022

Медицинская библиотека · Movement disorders : official journal of the Movement Disorder Society · 2022

Neuropsychological Functioning in Primary Dystonia: Updated and Expanded Multidomain Meta-Analysis.

Aita Stephen L, Del Bene Victor A, Marotta Dario A, Pizer Jasmin H, Hawley Nanako A, Niccolai Lindsay, Walker Harrison C, Gerstenecker Adam, Martin Roy C, Clay Olivio J, Crowe Michael, Triebel Kristen L, Hill Benjamin D

СтатьяМетаанализПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Primary dystonia is conventionally considered as a motor disorder, though an emerging literature reports associated cognitive dysfunction.

OBJECTIVES

Here, we conducted meta-analyses on studies comparing clinical measures of cognition in persons with primary dystonia and healthy controls (HCs).

METHODS

We searched PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Scopus, and PsycINFO (January 2000-October 2020). Analyses were modeled under random effects. We used Hedge's g as a bias-corrected estimate of effect size, where negative values indicate lower performance in dystonia versus controls. Between-study heterogeneity and bias were primarily assessed with Cochran's Q, I2 , and Egger's regression.

RESULTS

From 866 initial results, 20 studies met criteria for analysis (dystonia n = 739, controls n = 643; 254 effect sizes extracted). Meta-analysis showed a significant combined effect size of primary dystonia across all studies (g = -0.56, P < 0.001), with low heterogeneity (Q = 25.26, P = 0.15, I2  =  24.78). Within-domain effects of primary dystonia were motor speed = -0.84, nonmotor speed = -0.83, global cognition = -0.65, language = -0.54, executive functioning = -0.53, learning/memory = -0.46, visuospatial/construction = -0.44, and simple/complex attention = -0.37 (P-values <0.01). High heterogeneity was observed in the motor/nonmotor speed and learning/memory domains. There was no evidence of publication bias. Moderator analyses were mostly negative but possibly underpowered. Blepharospasm samples showed worse performance than other focal/cervical dystonias. Those with inherited (ie, genetic) disease etiology demonstrated worse performance than acquired.

CONCLUSIONS

Dystonia patients consistently demonstrated lower performances on neuropsychological tests versus HCs. Effect sizes were generally moderate in strength, clustering around -0.50 SD units. Within the speed domain, results suggested cognitive slowing beyond effects from motor symptoms. Overall, findings indicate dystonia patients experience multidomain cognitive difficulties, as detected by neuropsychological tests. © 2022 International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society.

Для цитирования: Aita Stephen L, Del Bene Victor A, Marotta Dario A, Pizer Jasmin H, Hawley Nanako A, Niccolai Lindsay, Walker Harrison C, Gerstenecker Adam, Martin Roy C, Clay Olivio J, Crowe Michael, Triebel Kristen L, Hill Benjamin D. Neuropsychological Functioning in Primary Dystonia: Updated and Expanded Multidomain Meta-Analysis.. Movement disorders : official journal of the Movement Disorder Society. 2022. DOI: 10.1002/mds.29022.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.