Urology · 2022
Role of Preoperative Ureteral Stent on Outcomes of Retrograde Intra-Renal Surgery (RIRS) in Children. Results From a Comparative, Large, Multicenter Series.
Многоцентровое исследованиеСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Castellani Daniele, Somani Bhaskar Kumar, Ferretti Stefania, Gatti Claudia, Sekerci Cagri Akin, Madarriaga Yesica Quiroz, Fong Khi Yung, Campobasso Davide, Ragoori Deepak, Shrestha Anil, Vaddi Chandra Mohan, Bhatia Tanuj Paul, Sinha Mriganka Mani, Lim Ee Jean, Teoh Jeremy Yuen-Chun, Griffin Stephen, Tur Anna Bujon, Tanidir Yiloren, Traxer Olivier, Gauhar Vineet
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: To assess outcomes of pre-stenting versus non-pre-stenting in children undergoing retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) for intrarenal stones.
METHODS: Children/adolescent with kidney stones undergoing RIRS in 9 centers between 2015 and 2020 were retrospectively reviewed.
EXCLUSION CRITERIA: ureteral lithotripsy, bilateral procedures. Stone-free status was evaluated at 3-month and defined as a single residual fragment (RF) ≤2 mm/absence of multiple fragments. Patients were divided into two groups (Group 1 no-prestenting; Group 2 prestenting). Student's, Chi-square and Fisher's exact test was used to assess difference between groups. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression analysis were performed to predict RF. Statistical significance: P-value <0.05.
RESULTS: Three hundred eighty-nine children/adolescents were included (192 patients in Group 1). Prestented patients were younger compared with non-prestented (mean age 8.30 ± 4.93 vs 10.43 ± 4.30 years, P < 0.001). There were no differences in stone characteristics (number, size, locations). Lasing and total surgical time were similar. Urinary tract infections were more prevalent in Group 2 (10.7%) compared to Group 1 (3.7%, P = 0.016). Sepsis occurred in 2.1% of patients in Group 2 and no patient in Group 1 (P = 0.146). 30.7% patients in Group 1 and 26.4% in Group 2 had RF (P = 0.322). In univariate logistic regression analysis, stone size was associated with RF (OR 1.12 95%CI 1.06-1.18, P < 0.001), whereas Thulium fiber laser with a lower incidence (OR 0.24 95%CI 0.06-0.69, p=0.020). Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that stone size was associated with RF (OR 1.20 95%CI 1.08-1.36, P = 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: RIRS showed similar stone-free rate in pre and non-prestented children/adolescents, although prestented patients were younger. A higher risk of post-operative infections was reported in prestented patients.
METHODS: Children/adolescent with kidney stones undergoing RIRS in 9 centers between 2015 and 2020 were retrospectively reviewed.
EXCLUSION CRITERIA: ureteral lithotripsy, bilateral procedures. Stone-free status was evaluated at 3-month and defined as a single residual fragment (RF) ≤2 mm/absence of multiple fragments. Patients were divided into two groups (Group 1 no-prestenting; Group 2 prestenting). Student's, Chi-square and Fisher's exact test was used to assess difference between groups. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression analysis were performed to predict RF. Statistical significance: P-value <0.05.
RESULTS: Three hundred eighty-nine children/adolescents were included (192 patients in Group 1). Prestented patients were younger compared with non-prestented (mean age 8.30 ± 4.93 vs 10.43 ± 4.30 years, P < 0.001). There were no differences in stone characteristics (number, size, locations). Lasing and total surgical time were similar. Urinary tract infections were more prevalent in Group 2 (10.7%) compared to Group 1 (3.7%, P = 0.016). Sepsis occurred in 2.1% of patients in Group 2 and no patient in Group 1 (P = 0.146). 30.7% patients in Group 1 and 26.4% in Group 2 had RF (P = 0.322). In univariate logistic regression analysis, stone size was associated with RF (OR 1.12 95%CI 1.06-1.18, P < 0.001), whereas Thulium fiber laser with a lower incidence (OR 0.24 95%CI 0.06-0.69, p=0.020). Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that stone size was associated with RF (OR 1.20 95%CI 1.08-1.36, P = 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: RIRS showed similar stone-free rate in pre and non-prestented children/adolescents, although prestented patients were younger. A higher risk of post-operative infections was reported in prestented patients.