Surgery · 2009
Thymectomy is more effective than conservative treatment for myasthenia gravis regarding outcome and clinical improvement.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Bachmann Kai, Burkhardt Doreen, Schreiter Inken, Kaifi Jussuf, Schurr Paulus, Busch Christoph, Thayssen Gunther, Izbicki Jakob R, Strate Tim
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Myasthenia gravis (MG) is an autoimmune disease with a tremendous impact on the quality of life. Controversies over which patients should be operated on because they may benefit most from thymectomy are still ongoing. The aim of this study was to report our long-term results of patients with MG with comparison of thymectomy and conservative treatment.
METHODS: We report a series of 252 patients with MG. Survival data were generated. Patients were seen in the outpatient clinic, where a modified Osserman score and quality of life score were evaluated at the end of the follow-up period for all surviving patients.
RESULTS: A total of 172 patients with MG were followed after thymectomy or with conservative treatment for a median time of 9.8 years. Patients who underwent thymectomy had significantly greater rates of remission and improvement compared with conservative treatment. Furthermore, they had a significantly greater survival.
CONCLUSION: Currently, different effective modalities of treatment are available in patients with MG. In our long-term follow-up, thymectomy was superior to conservative treatment regarding overall survival, clinical improvement, and remission rate. Therefore, thymectomy should be considered strongly for all patients with generalized MG.
METHODS: We report a series of 252 patients with MG. Survival data were generated. Patients were seen in the outpatient clinic, where a modified Osserman score and quality of life score were evaluated at the end of the follow-up period for all surviving patients.
RESULTS: A total of 172 patients with MG were followed after thymectomy or with conservative treatment for a median time of 9.8 years. Patients who underwent thymectomy had significantly greater rates of remission and improvement compared with conservative treatment. Furthermore, they had a significantly greater survival.
CONCLUSION: Currently, different effective modalities of treatment are available in patients with MG. In our long-term follow-up, thymectomy was superior to conservative treatment regarding overall survival, clinical improvement, and remission rate. Therefore, thymectomy should be considered strongly for all patients with generalized MG.