Panminerva medica · 1999
Serum and salivary antiendomysium antibodies in the screening of coeliac disease.
Клиническое исследованиеКонтролируемое клиническое исследованиеСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Di Leo M, Weisz G, Ansaldi Balocco N
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Antiendomysium antibodies (EMA) detection in serum is the best screening test for coeliac disease (CD): in saliva it has not yet been assayed. Aims of this study are: to verify the presence of EMA in saliva collected with a not invasive technique; to evaluate the validity of serum and salivary EMA in CD screening.
METHODS: We investigated 130 subjects divided into 3 groups: "A": 45 untreated CD patients (mean age 6.11); "B": 18 CD patients treated with a gluten free diet (mean age 13.2); "C": 67 controls (mean age 8.9). We performed the EMA test using the indirect immunofluorescence technique, in serum and in saliva concentrated samples.
RESULTS: Our results show: sensitivity EMA serum 100%; specificity EMA serum 96.5%; sensitivity EMA saliva 46.5%; specificity EMA saliva 100%; pos. pred. value EMA serum 93.5%; neg. pred. value serum 100%; pos. pred. value EMA saliva 100%; neg. pred. value saliva 78.7%.
CONCLUSIONS: Conclusion indicates a high specificity of salivary EMA and a high sensitivity of serum EMA, anyway biopsy is still recommended for diagnosis of CD.
METHODS: We investigated 130 subjects divided into 3 groups: "A": 45 untreated CD patients (mean age 6.11); "B": 18 CD patients treated with a gluten free diet (mean age 13.2); "C": 67 controls (mean age 8.9). We performed the EMA test using the indirect immunofluorescence technique, in serum and in saliva concentrated samples.
RESULTS: Our results show: sensitivity EMA serum 100%; specificity EMA serum 96.5%; sensitivity EMA saliva 46.5%; specificity EMA saliva 100%; pos. pred. value EMA serum 93.5%; neg. pred. value serum 100%; pos. pred. value EMA saliva 100%; neg. pred. value saliva 78.7%.
CONCLUSIONS: Conclusion indicates a high specificity of salivary EMA and a high sensitivity of serum EMA, anyway biopsy is still recommended for diagnosis of CD.