European journal of gastroenterology & hepatology · 1996
Follow-up of treated coeliac patients: sugar absorption test and intestinal biopsies compared.
Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Uil J J, van Elburg R M, van Overbeek F M, Meyer J W, Mulder C J, Heymans H S
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: To determine whether the sugar absorption test (SAT) during follow-up of patients with coeliac disease on a gluten-free diet (GFD) correlates with improvement of the villous architecture of the small intestine.
METHODS: The SAT was performed in coeliacs at diagnosis and during follow-up with GFD. For the SAT, a solution of lactulose (L) and mannitol (M) was given to the fasting patient and the L-M ratio calculated in a 5-hour urine sample by gas chromatography: ratios > 0.089 are considered abnormal. The solution was made hyperosmolar by adding sucrose (1560 mmol/l).
RESULTS: The L-M ratio was 2-3 times higher at diagnosis than either at 8 months to 2 years gluten free, or beyond 2 years gluten free, consecutively. The L-M ratio (mean, range) was significantly higher in cases of biopsies with (sub)total villous atrophy (VA) (0.388, 0.062-0.804, n = 28), partial VA (0.240, 0.062-0.841, n = 18) and villous irregularity (0.143, 0.017-0.322, n = 29) than in case of normalized histology after GFD (0.085, 0.021-0.230, n = 19). The rate of normalization of functional integrity was slower in adults than in children, demonstrated by a combination of histology and SAT.
CONCLUSION: The SAT correlates well with the degree of VA. It is important for daily clinical practice that the simple and non-invasive SAT can be used as an indicator of intestinal damage, thus influencing need for and timing of intestinal biopsies.
METHODS: The SAT was performed in coeliacs at diagnosis and during follow-up with GFD. For the SAT, a solution of lactulose (L) and mannitol (M) was given to the fasting patient and the L-M ratio calculated in a 5-hour urine sample by gas chromatography: ratios > 0.089 are considered abnormal. The solution was made hyperosmolar by adding sucrose (1560 mmol/l).
RESULTS: The L-M ratio was 2-3 times higher at diagnosis than either at 8 months to 2 years gluten free, or beyond 2 years gluten free, consecutively. The L-M ratio (mean, range) was significantly higher in cases of biopsies with (sub)total villous atrophy (VA) (0.388, 0.062-0.804, n = 28), partial VA (0.240, 0.062-0.841, n = 18) and villous irregularity (0.143, 0.017-0.322, n = 29) than in case of normalized histology after GFD (0.085, 0.021-0.230, n = 19). The rate of normalization of functional integrity was slower in adults than in children, demonstrated by a combination of histology and SAT.
CONCLUSION: The SAT correlates well with the degree of VA. It is important for daily clinical practice that the simple and non-invasive SAT can be used as an indicator of intestinal damage, thus influencing need for and timing of intestinal biopsies.